Cargando…
Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: The number of people living with stroke has increased demand for rehabilitation. A potential solution is telerehabilitation for health care delivery to promote self-management. One such approach is the Augmented Community Telerehabilitation Intervention (ACTIV). This structured 6-month p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33190615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971765 |
_version_ | 1783623267105374208 |
---|---|
author | Saywell, Nicola L. Vandal, Alain C. Mudge, Suzie Hale, Leigh Brown, Paul Feigin, Valery Hanger, Carl Taylor, Denise |
author_facet | Saywell, Nicola L. Vandal, Alain C. Mudge, Suzie Hale, Leigh Brown, Paul Feigin, Valery Hanger, Carl Taylor, Denise |
author_sort | Saywell, Nicola L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The number of people living with stroke has increased demand for rehabilitation. A potential solution is telerehabilitation for health care delivery to promote self-management. One such approach is the Augmented Community Telerehabilitation Intervention (ACTIV). This structured 6-month program uses limited face-to-face sessions, telephone contact, and text messages to augment stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ACTIV improved physical function compared with usual care. METHODS: This 2-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 New Zealand centers. Inclusion criteria were patients with first-ever stroke, age >20 years, and discharged home. A blinded assessor completed outcome measurement in participants’ homes at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months postintervention. Stratified block randomization occurred after baseline assessment, with participants allocated to ACTIV or usual care control. RESULTS: A total of 95 people were recruited (ACTIV: n = 47; control: n = 48). Postintervention intention-to-treat analysis found a nonsignificant difference between the groups in scores (4·51; P = .07) for physical function (measured by the physical subcomponent of the Stroke Impact Scale). The planned per-protocol analysis (ACTIV: n = 43; control: n = 48) found a significant difference in physical function between the groups (5·28; P = .04). Improvements in physical function were not maintained at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ACTIV was not effective in improving physical function in the ACTIV group compared with the usual care group. The per-protocol analysis raises the possibility that for those who receive more than 50% of the intervention, ACTIV may be effective in preventing deterioration or even improving physical function in people with stroke, in the period immediately following discharge from hospital. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7739128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77391282021-01-08 Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial Saywell, Nicola L. Vandal, Alain C. Mudge, Suzie Hale, Leigh Brown, Paul Feigin, Valery Hanger, Carl Taylor, Denise Neurorehabil Neural Repair Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: The number of people living with stroke has increased demand for rehabilitation. A potential solution is telerehabilitation for health care delivery to promote self-management. One such approach is the Augmented Community Telerehabilitation Intervention (ACTIV). This structured 6-month program uses limited face-to-face sessions, telephone contact, and text messages to augment stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ACTIV improved physical function compared with usual care. METHODS: This 2-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 New Zealand centers. Inclusion criteria were patients with first-ever stroke, age >20 years, and discharged home. A blinded assessor completed outcome measurement in participants’ homes at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months postintervention. Stratified block randomization occurred after baseline assessment, with participants allocated to ACTIV or usual care control. RESULTS: A total of 95 people were recruited (ACTIV: n = 47; control: n = 48). Postintervention intention-to-treat analysis found a nonsignificant difference between the groups in scores (4·51; P = .07) for physical function (measured by the physical subcomponent of the Stroke Impact Scale). The planned per-protocol analysis (ACTIV: n = 43; control: n = 48) found a significant difference in physical function between the groups (5·28; P = .04). Improvements in physical function were not maintained at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ACTIV was not effective in improving physical function in the ACTIV group compared with the usual care group. The per-protocol analysis raises the possibility that for those who receive more than 50% of the intervention, ACTIV may be effective in preventing deterioration or even improving physical function in people with stroke, in the period immediately following discharge from hospital. SAGE Publications 2020-11-16 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7739128/ /pubmed/33190615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971765 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Saywell, Nicola L. Vandal, Alain C. Mudge, Suzie Hale, Leigh Brown, Paul Feigin, Valery Hanger, Carl Taylor, Denise Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | telerehabilitation after stroke using readily available technology: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33190615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971765 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saywellnicolal telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandalalainc telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mudgesuzie telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT haleleigh telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brownpaul telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT feiginvalery telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hangercarl telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taylordenise telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial |