Cargando…

Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The number of people living with stroke has increased demand for rehabilitation. A potential solution is telerehabilitation for health care delivery to promote self-management. One such approach is the Augmented Community Telerehabilitation Intervention (ACTIV). This structured 6-month p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saywell, Nicola L., Vandal, Alain C., Mudge, Suzie, Hale, Leigh, Brown, Paul, Feigin, Valery, Hanger, Carl, Taylor, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33190615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971765
_version_ 1783623267105374208
author Saywell, Nicola L.
Vandal, Alain C.
Mudge, Suzie
Hale, Leigh
Brown, Paul
Feigin, Valery
Hanger, Carl
Taylor, Denise
author_facet Saywell, Nicola L.
Vandal, Alain C.
Mudge, Suzie
Hale, Leigh
Brown, Paul
Feigin, Valery
Hanger, Carl
Taylor, Denise
author_sort Saywell, Nicola L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of people living with stroke has increased demand for rehabilitation. A potential solution is telerehabilitation for health care delivery to promote self-management. One such approach is the Augmented Community Telerehabilitation Intervention (ACTIV). This structured 6-month program uses limited face-to-face sessions, telephone contact, and text messages to augment stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ACTIV improved physical function compared with usual care. METHODS: This 2-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 New Zealand centers. Inclusion criteria were patients with first-ever stroke, age >20 years, and discharged home. A blinded assessor completed outcome measurement in participants’ homes at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months postintervention. Stratified block randomization occurred after baseline assessment, with participants allocated to ACTIV or usual care control. RESULTS: A total of 95 people were recruited (ACTIV: n = 47; control: n = 48). Postintervention intention-to-treat analysis found a nonsignificant difference between the groups in scores (4·51; P = .07) for physical function (measured by the physical subcomponent of the Stroke Impact Scale). The planned per-protocol analysis (ACTIV: n = 43; control: n = 48) found a significant difference in physical function between the groups (5·28; P = .04). Improvements in physical function were not maintained at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ACTIV was not effective in improving physical function in the ACTIV group compared with the usual care group. The per-protocol analysis raises the possibility that for those who receive more than 50% of the intervention, ACTIV may be effective in preventing deterioration or even improving physical function in people with stroke, in the period immediately following discharge from hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77391282021-01-08 Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial Saywell, Nicola L. Vandal, Alain C. Mudge, Suzie Hale, Leigh Brown, Paul Feigin, Valery Hanger, Carl Taylor, Denise Neurorehabil Neural Repair Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: The number of people living with stroke has increased demand for rehabilitation. A potential solution is telerehabilitation for health care delivery to promote self-management. One such approach is the Augmented Community Telerehabilitation Intervention (ACTIV). This structured 6-month program uses limited face-to-face sessions, telephone contact, and text messages to augment stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ACTIV improved physical function compared with usual care. METHODS: This 2-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 New Zealand centers. Inclusion criteria were patients with first-ever stroke, age >20 years, and discharged home. A blinded assessor completed outcome measurement in participants’ homes at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months postintervention. Stratified block randomization occurred after baseline assessment, with participants allocated to ACTIV or usual care control. RESULTS: A total of 95 people were recruited (ACTIV: n = 47; control: n = 48). Postintervention intention-to-treat analysis found a nonsignificant difference between the groups in scores (4·51; P = .07) for physical function (measured by the physical subcomponent of the Stroke Impact Scale). The planned per-protocol analysis (ACTIV: n = 43; control: n = 48) found a significant difference in physical function between the groups (5·28; P = .04). Improvements in physical function were not maintained at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ACTIV was not effective in improving physical function in the ACTIV group compared with the usual care group. The per-protocol analysis raises the possibility that for those who receive more than 50% of the intervention, ACTIV may be effective in preventing deterioration or even improving physical function in people with stroke, in the period immediately following discharge from hospital. SAGE Publications 2020-11-16 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7739128/ /pubmed/33190615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971765 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Saywell, Nicola L.
Vandal, Alain C.
Mudge, Suzie
Hale, Leigh
Brown, Paul
Feigin, Valery
Hanger, Carl
Taylor, Denise
Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort telerehabilitation after stroke using readily available technology: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33190615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971765
work_keys_str_mv AT saywellnicolal telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandalalainc telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mudgesuzie telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haleleigh telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brownpaul telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feiginvalery telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hangercarl telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taylordenise telerehabilitationafterstrokeusingreadilyavailabletechnologyarandomizedcontrolledtrial