Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Currently, 6-month oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has been recommended as the preferred adjuvant treatment against high-risk stage 2 and stage 3 colon cancer patients. METHODS: Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ameri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Ji, Shuai, Xiaoming, Gao, Jinbo, Wang, Guobin, Tao, Kaixiong, Cai, Kailin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835920974195
_version_ 1783623267566747648
author Cheng, Ji
Shuai, Xiaoming
Gao, Jinbo
Wang, Guobin
Tao, Kaixiong
Cai, Kailin
author_facet Cheng, Ji
Shuai, Xiaoming
Gao, Jinbo
Wang, Guobin
Tao, Kaixiong
Cai, Kailin
author_sort Cheng, Ji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, 6-month oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has been recommended as the preferred adjuvant treatment against high-risk stage 2 and stage 3 colon cancer patients. METHODS: Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meeting libraries from inception to November 2019. Regarding survival and tolerability, randomized controlled trials comparing different adjuvant systemic regimens against high-risk stage 2 and stage 3 colon cancer were eligible. Disease-free survival was primary endpoint. Network calculation was based on a random-effects model, and relative ranking of each node was numerically indicated by p score. RESULTS: A total of 30 trials were included, corresponding to 54,109 patients. Regarding disease-free survival, none of the analyzed regimens displayed significant superiority against common comparator 6-month capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX), while 12-month [network hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 (0.60–1.10); 0.79 (0.57–1.10)] and 3-month XELOX [0.95 (0.86–1.04); 0.93 (0.83–1.05)] were top-ranking regimens showing non-inferiority among overall and stage 3 patients. Moreover, by pairwise meta-analysis, 3-month XELOX demonstrated significant superiority against 6-month XELOX among low-risk stage 3 patients [pairwise HR 0.78 (0.63–0.97)]. Concerning adverse events, 3-month oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was significantly better than the 6-month counterpart with respect to peripheral sensory neuropathy, thrombocytopenia and fatigue. The 12-month capecitabine monotherapy failed to display non-inferiority among other major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-month XELOX treatment could be an alternative option of the 6-month regimen among low-risk stage 3 patients. Among high-risk stage 3 patients, 6-month oxaliplatin-based regimens still seem more competitive. In addition, clinical application of 12-month capecitabine monotherapy should be cautious, despite its top rankings, especially among non-Asian countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77391302021-01-04 Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis Cheng, Ji Shuai, Xiaoming Gao, Jinbo Wang, Guobin Tao, Kaixiong Cai, Kailin Ther Adv Med Oncol Original Research BACKGROUND: Currently, 6-month oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has been recommended as the preferred adjuvant treatment against high-risk stage 2 and stage 3 colon cancer patients. METHODS: Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meeting libraries from inception to November 2019. Regarding survival and tolerability, randomized controlled trials comparing different adjuvant systemic regimens against high-risk stage 2 and stage 3 colon cancer were eligible. Disease-free survival was primary endpoint. Network calculation was based on a random-effects model, and relative ranking of each node was numerically indicated by p score. RESULTS: A total of 30 trials were included, corresponding to 54,109 patients. Regarding disease-free survival, none of the analyzed regimens displayed significant superiority against common comparator 6-month capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX), while 12-month [network hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 (0.60–1.10); 0.79 (0.57–1.10)] and 3-month XELOX [0.95 (0.86–1.04); 0.93 (0.83–1.05)] were top-ranking regimens showing non-inferiority among overall and stage 3 patients. Moreover, by pairwise meta-analysis, 3-month XELOX demonstrated significant superiority against 6-month XELOX among low-risk stage 3 patients [pairwise HR 0.78 (0.63–0.97)]. Concerning adverse events, 3-month oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was significantly better than the 6-month counterpart with respect to peripheral sensory neuropathy, thrombocytopenia and fatigue. The 12-month capecitabine monotherapy failed to display non-inferiority among other major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-month XELOX treatment could be an alternative option of the 6-month regimen among low-risk stage 3 patients. Among high-risk stage 3 patients, 6-month oxaliplatin-based regimens still seem more competitive. In addition, clinical application of 12-month capecitabine monotherapy should be cautious, despite its top rankings, especially among non-Asian countries. SAGE Publications 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7739130/ /pubmed/33403014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835920974195 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cheng, Ji
Shuai, Xiaoming
Gao, Jinbo
Wang, Guobin
Tao, Kaixiong
Cai, Kailin
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant systemic treatments against resectable colon cancer: a network meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835920974195
work_keys_str_mv AT chengji comparativeefficacyandtolerabilityofadjuvantsystemictreatmentsagainstresectablecoloncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT shuaixiaoming comparativeefficacyandtolerabilityofadjuvantsystemictreatmentsagainstresectablecoloncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT gaojinbo comparativeefficacyandtolerabilityofadjuvantsystemictreatmentsagainstresectablecoloncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangguobin comparativeefficacyandtolerabilityofadjuvantsystemictreatmentsagainstresectablecoloncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT taokaixiong comparativeefficacyandtolerabilityofadjuvantsystemictreatmentsagainstresectablecoloncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT caikailin comparativeefficacyandtolerabilityofadjuvantsystemictreatmentsagainstresectablecoloncanceranetworkmetaanalysis