A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Campbell, Bill I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Reply
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040086
_version_ 1783623295340380160
author Campbell, Bill I.
author_facet Campbell, Bill I.
author_sort Campbell, Bill I.
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77392552021-01-13 A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial” Campbell, Bill I. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Reply MDPI 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7739255/ /pubmed/33467301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040086 Text en © 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Reply
Campbell, Bill I.
A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_full A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_fullStr A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_full_unstemmed A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_short A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_sort reply to contrary to the conclusions stated in the paper, only dry fat-free mass was different between groups upon reanalysis—comment on: “intermittent energy restriction attenuates the loss of fat-free mass in resistance trained individuals: a randomized controlled trial”
topic Reply
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040086
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellbilli areplytocontrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellbilli replytocontrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial

Ejemplares similares