Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peos, Jackson, Brown, Andrew W., Vorland, Colby J., Allison, David B., Sainsbury, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Comment
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040085
_version_ 1783623313577213952
author Peos, Jackson
Brown, Andrew W.
Vorland, Colby J.
Allison, David B.
Sainsbury, Amanda
author_facet Peos, Jackson
Brown, Andrew W.
Vorland, Colby J.
Allison, David B.
Sainsbury, Amanda
author_sort Peos, Jackson
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77393362021-01-13 Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial” Peos, Jackson Brown, Andrew W. Vorland, Colby J. Allison, David B. Sainsbury, Amanda J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Comment MDPI 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7739336/ /pubmed/33467300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040085 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Comment
Peos, Jackson
Brown, Andrew W.
Vorland, Colby J.
Allison, David B.
Sainsbury, Amanda
Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_full Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_fullStr Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_full_unstemmed Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_short Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”
title_sort contrary to the conclusions stated in the paper, only dry fat-free mass was different between groups upon reanalysis. comment on: “intermittent energy restriction attenuates the loss of fat-free mass in resistance trained individuals. a randomized controlled trial”
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040085
work_keys_str_mv AT peosjackson contrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brownandreww contrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vorlandcolbyj contrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT allisondavidb contrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sainsburyamanda contrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial

Ejemplares similares