Cargando…

Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes

Background: Aerial fitness is quickly gaining popularity; however, little is known regarding the physiological demands of aerial athletes. The purpose of the study was to examine contralateral muscle imbalances, compare dominant versus non-dominant hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratios, and to estab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruggieri, Rachel M., Costa, Pablo B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk4030049
_version_ 1783623318586261504
author Ruggieri, Rachel M.
Costa, Pablo B.
author_facet Ruggieri, Rachel M.
Costa, Pablo B.
author_sort Ruggieri, Rachel M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Aerial fitness is quickly gaining popularity; however, little is known regarding the physiological demands of aerial athletes. The purpose of the study was to examine contralateral muscle imbalances, compare dominant versus non-dominant hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratios, and to establish a physiological profile of recreational aerial athletes. Methods: Thirteen aerialist women visited a local aerial studio to participate in a data collection session to examine isometric levels of upper and lower body strength, muscle endurance, flexibility, balance, and cardiovascular fitness. Results: No significant differences were found between dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength (p = 0.077), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee flexion (p = 0.483), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee extension (p = 0.152), or dominant and non-dominant isometric H:Q ratios (p = 0.102). In addition, no significant difference was found between isometric dominant H:Q ratio and the widely-used value of 0.60 (p = 0.139). However, isometric non-dominant H:Q ratio was significantly lower than the 0.60 criterion (p = 0.004). Aerial athletes demonstrated to have excellent flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and average strength. Conclusions: Aerial fitness may be another recreational activity that could be used to maintain higher levels of flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and strength. Aerialists may want to consider focusing on strengthening the lower body and balancing the hamstrings and quadriceps muscle strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77393572021-01-13 Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes Ruggieri, Rachel M. Costa, Pablo B. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Article Background: Aerial fitness is quickly gaining popularity; however, little is known regarding the physiological demands of aerial athletes. The purpose of the study was to examine contralateral muscle imbalances, compare dominant versus non-dominant hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratios, and to establish a physiological profile of recreational aerial athletes. Methods: Thirteen aerialist women visited a local aerial studio to participate in a data collection session to examine isometric levels of upper and lower body strength, muscle endurance, flexibility, balance, and cardiovascular fitness. Results: No significant differences were found between dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength (p = 0.077), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee flexion (p = 0.483), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee extension (p = 0.152), or dominant and non-dominant isometric H:Q ratios (p = 0.102). In addition, no significant difference was found between isometric dominant H:Q ratio and the widely-used value of 0.60 (p = 0.139). However, isometric non-dominant H:Q ratio was significantly lower than the 0.60 criterion (p = 0.004). Aerial athletes demonstrated to have excellent flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and average strength. Conclusions: Aerial fitness may be another recreational activity that could be used to maintain higher levels of flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and strength. Aerialists may want to consider focusing on strengthening the lower body and balancing the hamstrings and quadriceps muscle strength. MDPI 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7739357/ /pubmed/33467364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk4030049 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ruggieri, Rachel M.
Costa, Pablo B.
Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_full Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_fullStr Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_short Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_sort contralateral muscle imbalances and physiological profile of recreational aerial athletes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk4030049
work_keys_str_mv AT ruggierirachelm contralateralmuscleimbalancesandphysiologicalprofileofrecreationalaerialathletes
AT costapablob contralateralmuscleimbalancesandphysiologicalprofileofrecreationalaerialathletes