Cargando…

External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study

Post-exercise recovery is a complex process involving a return of performance and a physiological or perceptual feeling close to pre-exercise status. The hypothesis of this study is that the device investigated here is effective in evaluating the recovery state of professional cyclists in order to p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ardigò, Luca Paolo, Palermi, Stefano, Padulo, Johnny, Dhahbi, Wissem, Russo, Luca, Linetti, Simone, Cular, Drazen, Tomljanovic, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00067
_version_ 1783623372543885312
author Ardigò, Luca Paolo
Palermi, Stefano
Padulo, Johnny
Dhahbi, Wissem
Russo, Luca
Linetti, Simone
Cular, Drazen
Tomljanovic, Mario
author_facet Ardigò, Luca Paolo
Palermi, Stefano
Padulo, Johnny
Dhahbi, Wissem
Russo, Luca
Linetti, Simone
Cular, Drazen
Tomljanovic, Mario
author_sort Ardigò, Luca Paolo
collection PubMed
description Post-exercise recovery is a complex process involving a return of performance and a physiological or perceptual feeling close to pre-exercise status. The hypothesis of this study is that the device investigated here is effective in evaluating the recovery state of professional cyclists in order to plan effective training. Ten professional male cyclists belonging to the same team were enrolled in this study. Participants performed a 7-day exercise program [D1, D4, and D7: low-intensity training; D2 and D5: passive recovery; D3: maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2Max)) test (for maximum mechanical power assessment only); and D6: constant load test]. During the week of monitoring, each morning before getting up, the device assessed each participant's so-called Organic Readiness {OR [arbitrary unit (a.u.)]}, based on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), features of past exercise session, and following self-perceived condition. Based on its readings and algorithm, the device graphically displayed four different colors/values, indicating general exercise recommendations: green/3 = “you can train hard,” yellow/2 = “you can train averagely,” orange/1 = “you can train lightly,” or red/0 = “you should recover passively.” During the week of research, morning OR values and Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons showed significant differences between days and, namely, values (1) D2 (after low intensity training) was higher than D4 (after VO(2Max) test; P = 0.033 and d = 1.296) and (2) D3 and D6 (after passive recovery) were higher than D4 (after VO(2Max) test; P = 0.006 and d = 2.519) and D5 (after low intensity training; P = 0.033 and d = 1.341). The receiver operating characteristic analysis area under curve (AUC) recorded a result of 0.727 and could differentiate between D3 and D4 with a sensitivity and a specificity of 80%. Preliminarily, the device investigated is a sufficiently effective and sensitive/specific device to assess the recovery state of athletes in order to plan effective training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77396722020-12-17 External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study Ardigò, Luca Paolo Palermi, Stefano Padulo, Johnny Dhahbi, Wissem Russo, Luca Linetti, Simone Cular, Drazen Tomljanovic, Mario Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living Post-exercise recovery is a complex process involving a return of performance and a physiological or perceptual feeling close to pre-exercise status. The hypothesis of this study is that the device investigated here is effective in evaluating the recovery state of professional cyclists in order to plan effective training. Ten professional male cyclists belonging to the same team were enrolled in this study. Participants performed a 7-day exercise program [D1, D4, and D7: low-intensity training; D2 and D5: passive recovery; D3: maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2Max)) test (for maximum mechanical power assessment only); and D6: constant load test]. During the week of monitoring, each morning before getting up, the device assessed each participant's so-called Organic Readiness {OR [arbitrary unit (a.u.)]}, based on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), features of past exercise session, and following self-perceived condition. Based on its readings and algorithm, the device graphically displayed four different colors/values, indicating general exercise recommendations: green/3 = “you can train hard,” yellow/2 = “you can train averagely,” orange/1 = “you can train lightly,” or red/0 = “you should recover passively.” During the week of research, morning OR values and Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons showed significant differences between days and, namely, values (1) D2 (after low intensity training) was higher than D4 (after VO(2Max) test; P = 0.033 and d = 1.296) and (2) D3 and D6 (after passive recovery) were higher than D4 (after VO(2Max) test; P = 0.006 and d = 2.519) and D5 (after low intensity training; P = 0.033 and d = 1.341). The receiver operating characteristic analysis area under curve (AUC) recorded a result of 0.727 and could differentiate between D3 and D4 with a sensitivity and a specificity of 80%. Preliminarily, the device investigated is a sufficiently effective and sensitive/specific device to assess the recovery state of athletes in order to plan effective training. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7739672/ /pubmed/33345058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00067 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ardigò, Palermi, Padulo, Dhahbi, Russo, Linetti, Cular and Tomljanovic. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Ardigò, Luca Paolo
Palermi, Stefano
Padulo, Johnny
Dhahbi, Wissem
Russo, Luca
Linetti, Simone
Cular, Drazen
Tomljanovic, Mario
External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study
title External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study
title_full External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study
title_short External Responsiveness of the SuperOp(TM) Device to Assess Recovery After Exercise: A Pilot Study
title_sort external responsiveness of the superop(tm) device to assess recovery after exercise: a pilot study
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00067
work_keys_str_mv AT ardigolucapaolo externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy
AT palermistefano externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy
AT padulojohnny externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy
AT dhahbiwissem externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy
AT russoluca externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy
AT linettisimone externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy
AT culardrazen externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy
AT tomljanovicmario externalresponsivenessofthesuperoptmdevicetoassessrecoveryafterexerciseapilotstudy