Cargando…

The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats

The current study investigated the effects of barbell placement on kinematics and muscle activity during the sticking region of back squats. Ten healthy medium- to well-trained male powerlifters [age 26.1 ± 11.2 years, body mass 90.2 ± 18.3 kg, height 1.83 ± 0.09 m, five repetition maximum (5RM) 158...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Tillaar, Roland, Knutli, Tom Roar, Larsen, Stian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.604177
_version_ 1783623386518257664
author van den Tillaar, Roland
Knutli, Tom Roar
Larsen, Stian
author_facet van den Tillaar, Roland
Knutli, Tom Roar
Larsen, Stian
author_sort van den Tillaar, Roland
collection PubMed
description The current study investigated the effects of barbell placement on kinematics and muscle activity during the sticking region of back squats. Ten healthy medium- to well-trained male powerlifters [age 26.1 ± 11.2 years, body mass 90.2 ± 18.3 kg, height 1.83 ± 0.09 m, five repetition maximum (5RM) 158 ± 29 kg] with at least 3 years of resistance-training experience were recruited. In a single session, participants performed 5RM movements using high bar and low bar squats, where absolute load, descent depth, and stance width were matched between squat conditions. The final repetition was analyzed using 3D kinematics and electromyography (EMG) around the sticking region. No differences in barbell and joint kinematics were observed in any phase, between both barbell modalities. Increased muscle activity in the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, and lower part of the erector spinae with the high bar, when compared with low bar conditions, was recorded. Furthermore, the gluteus maximus and medius had increased muscle activity over the three regions (pre-sticking > sticking > post-sticking), while the erector spinae, soleus, vastus lateralis, and rectus femoris experienced decreased muscle activity during the ascending phase. When depth and stance width were matched, the low bar technique was associated with lower erector spinae and quadriceps activity than the high bar technique. Thus, when the goal is to maximally activate knee extensors and the external load is matched, high bar placement would appear preferable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77397322020-12-17 The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats van den Tillaar, Roland Knutli, Tom Roar Larsen, Stian Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living The current study investigated the effects of barbell placement on kinematics and muscle activity during the sticking region of back squats. Ten healthy medium- to well-trained male powerlifters [age 26.1 ± 11.2 years, body mass 90.2 ± 18.3 kg, height 1.83 ± 0.09 m, five repetition maximum (5RM) 158 ± 29 kg] with at least 3 years of resistance-training experience were recruited. In a single session, participants performed 5RM movements using high bar and low bar squats, where absolute load, descent depth, and stance width were matched between squat conditions. The final repetition was analyzed using 3D kinematics and electromyography (EMG) around the sticking region. No differences in barbell and joint kinematics were observed in any phase, between both barbell modalities. Increased muscle activity in the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, and lower part of the erector spinae with the high bar, when compared with low bar conditions, was recorded. Furthermore, the gluteus maximus and medius had increased muscle activity over the three regions (pre-sticking > sticking > post-sticking), while the erector spinae, soleus, vastus lateralis, and rectus femoris experienced decreased muscle activity during the ascending phase. When depth and stance width were matched, the low bar technique was associated with lower erector spinae and quadriceps activity than the high bar technique. Thus, when the goal is to maximally activate knee extensors and the external load is matched, high bar placement would appear preferable. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7739732/ /pubmed/33345183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.604177 Text en Copyright © 2020 van den Tillaar, Knutli and Larsen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
van den Tillaar, Roland
Knutli, Tom Roar
Larsen, Stian
The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats
title The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats
title_full The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats
title_fullStr The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats
title_short The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats
title_sort effects of barbell placement on kinematics and muscle activation around the sticking region in squats
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.604177
work_keys_str_mv AT vandentillaarroland theeffectsofbarbellplacementonkinematicsandmuscleactivationaroundthestickingregioninsquats
AT knutlitomroar theeffectsofbarbellplacementonkinematicsandmuscleactivationaroundthestickingregioninsquats
AT larsenstian theeffectsofbarbellplacementonkinematicsandmuscleactivationaroundthestickingregioninsquats
AT vandentillaarroland effectsofbarbellplacementonkinematicsandmuscleactivationaroundthestickingregioninsquats
AT knutlitomroar effectsofbarbellplacementonkinematicsandmuscleactivationaroundthestickingregioninsquats
AT larsenstian effectsofbarbellplacementonkinematicsandmuscleactivationaroundthestickingregioninsquats