Cargando…

Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique

IAAF Rule 230.2 states that racewalkers must have no visible (to the human eye) loss of contact with the ground and that their advancing leg must be straightened from first contact with the ground until the “vertical upright position.” The aims of this study were first to analyze racewalking judges&...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanley, Brian, Tucker, Catherine B., Bissas, Athanassios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344933
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2019.00009
_version_ 1783623387032059904
author Hanley, Brian
Tucker, Catherine B.
Bissas, Athanassios
author_facet Hanley, Brian
Tucker, Catherine B.
Bissas, Athanassios
author_sort Hanley, Brian
collection PubMed
description IAAF Rule 230.2 states that racewalkers must have no visible (to the human eye) loss of contact with the ground and that their advancing leg must be straightened from first contact with the ground until the “vertical upright position.” The aims of this study were first to analyze racewalking judges' accuracy in assessing technique and, second, to measure flight times across a range of speeds to establish when athletes were likely to lose visible contact. Twenty racewalkers were recorded in a laboratory using a panning video camera (50 Hz), a high-speed camera (100 Hz), and three force plates (1,000 Hz). Eighty-three judges of different IAAF Levels (and none) viewed the panned videos online and indicated whether each athlete was racewalking legally. Flight times shorter than 0.033 s were detected by fewer than 12.5% of judges, and thus indicated non-visible loss of contact. Flight times between 0.040 and 0.045 s were usually detected by no more than three out of eight judges. Very long flight times (≥0.060 s) were detected by nearly all judges. The results also showed that what judges generally considered straightened knees (>177°) was close to a geometrically straight line. Within this inexact definition, IAAF World Championship-standard Level III judges were most accurate, being more likely to detect anatomically bent knees and less likely to indicate bent knees when they did not occur. For the second part, the men racewalked down a 45-m indoor track at 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 km/h in a randomized order, whereas the women's trials were at 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 km/h. Flight times, measured using an OptoJump Next photocell system (1,000 Hz), increased for the men from 0.015 s at 11 km/h to 0.040 s at 14 km/h and 0.044 s at 15 km/h, and for the women from 0.013 s at 10 km/h to 0.041 s at 13 km/h and 0.050 s at 14 km/h. For judging by the human eye, the threshold for avoiding visible loss of contact therefore occurred for most athletes at ~14 km/h for men and 13 km/h for women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77397352020-12-17 Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique Hanley, Brian Tucker, Catherine B. Bissas, Athanassios Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living IAAF Rule 230.2 states that racewalkers must have no visible (to the human eye) loss of contact with the ground and that their advancing leg must be straightened from first contact with the ground until the “vertical upright position.” The aims of this study were first to analyze racewalking judges' accuracy in assessing technique and, second, to measure flight times across a range of speeds to establish when athletes were likely to lose visible contact. Twenty racewalkers were recorded in a laboratory using a panning video camera (50 Hz), a high-speed camera (100 Hz), and three force plates (1,000 Hz). Eighty-three judges of different IAAF Levels (and none) viewed the panned videos online and indicated whether each athlete was racewalking legally. Flight times shorter than 0.033 s were detected by fewer than 12.5% of judges, and thus indicated non-visible loss of contact. Flight times between 0.040 and 0.045 s were usually detected by no more than three out of eight judges. Very long flight times (≥0.060 s) were detected by nearly all judges. The results also showed that what judges generally considered straightened knees (>177°) was close to a geometrically straight line. Within this inexact definition, IAAF World Championship-standard Level III judges were most accurate, being more likely to detect anatomically bent knees and less likely to indicate bent knees when they did not occur. For the second part, the men racewalked down a 45-m indoor track at 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 km/h in a randomized order, whereas the women's trials were at 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 km/h. Flight times, measured using an OptoJump Next photocell system (1,000 Hz), increased for the men from 0.015 s at 11 km/h to 0.040 s at 14 km/h and 0.044 s at 15 km/h, and for the women from 0.013 s at 10 km/h to 0.041 s at 13 km/h and 0.050 s at 14 km/h. For judging by the human eye, the threshold for avoiding visible loss of contact therefore occurred for most athletes at ~14 km/h for men and 13 km/h for women. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7739735/ /pubmed/33344933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2019.00009 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hanley, Tucker and Bissas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Hanley, Brian
Tucker, Catherine B.
Bissas, Athanassios
Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique
title Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique
title_full Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique
title_fullStr Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique
title_short Assessment of IAAF Racewalk Judges' Ability to Detect Legal and Non-legal Technique
title_sort assessment of iaaf racewalk judges' ability to detect legal and non-legal technique
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344933
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2019.00009
work_keys_str_mv AT hanleybrian assessmentofiaafracewalkjudgesabilitytodetectlegalandnonlegaltechnique
AT tuckercatherineb assessmentofiaafracewalkjudgesabilitytodetectlegalandnonlegaltechnique
AT bissasathanassios assessmentofiaafracewalkjudgesabilitytodetectlegalandnonlegaltechnique