Cargando…

Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude

We examined the viability of using mean propulsive velocity (MPV) to adjust the load in the countermovement jump (CMJ) at moderate altitude. Twenty-four volunteers were assigned to a 4-week power-oriented resistance training (R(T)) program in either normoxia (N, 690 m) or intermittent hypobaric hypo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Zamora, Lara, Padial, Paulino, Schoenfeld, Brad Jon, Feriche, Belén
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2019.00052
_version_ 1783623389135503360
author Rodríguez-Zamora, Lara
Padial, Paulino
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
Feriche, Belén
author_facet Rodríguez-Zamora, Lara
Padial, Paulino
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
Feriche, Belén
author_sort Rodríguez-Zamora, Lara
collection PubMed
description We examined the viability of using mean propulsive velocity (MPV) to adjust the load in the countermovement jump (CMJ) at moderate altitude. Twenty-four volunteers were assigned to a 4-week power-oriented resistance training (R(T)) program in either normoxia (N, 690 m) or intermittent hypobaric hypoxia (IH, 2,320 m). The load was adjusted to maintain execution velocity of CMJ at 1m·s(−1) of MPV. Relative peak power output (P(rel)), and percentage of velocity loss throughout the sets (VL) were determined for each session. The internal load was measured by the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The absolute load lifted was higher in IH compared to N (75.6 ± 8.4 vs. 58.5 ± 12.3 kg P < 0.001). However, similar relative increases for both groups were found when comparing the final values (IH: 8.2%, P = 0.007; N: 9.8%, P = 0.03) with no changes in VL between groups (P = 0.36). Post-study P(rel) improved significantly only in IH (+7% W·kg(−1), P = 0.002). Mean RPE was greater in IH vs. N (6.8 ± 1.5 vs. 5.6 ± 2, P < 0.001). The MPV seems to be a viable method for adjusting external load during R(T) at moderate altitude. However, given that R(T) at moderate altitude increases RPE, it is prudent to monitor internal load when using the MPV to best determine the actual physiological stress of the session.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77397442020-12-17 Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude Rodríguez-Zamora, Lara Padial, Paulino Schoenfeld, Brad Jon Feriche, Belén Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living We examined the viability of using mean propulsive velocity (MPV) to adjust the load in the countermovement jump (CMJ) at moderate altitude. Twenty-four volunteers were assigned to a 4-week power-oriented resistance training (R(T)) program in either normoxia (N, 690 m) or intermittent hypobaric hypoxia (IH, 2,320 m). The load was adjusted to maintain execution velocity of CMJ at 1m·s(−1) of MPV. Relative peak power output (P(rel)), and percentage of velocity loss throughout the sets (VL) were determined for each session. The internal load was measured by the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The absolute load lifted was higher in IH compared to N (75.6 ± 8.4 vs. 58.5 ± 12.3 kg P < 0.001). However, similar relative increases for both groups were found when comparing the final values (IH: 8.2%, P = 0.007; N: 9.8%, P = 0.03) with no changes in VL between groups (P = 0.36). Post-study P(rel) improved significantly only in IH (+7% W·kg(−1), P = 0.002). Mean RPE was greater in IH vs. N (6.8 ± 1.5 vs. 5.6 ± 2, P < 0.001). The MPV seems to be a viable method for adjusting external load during R(T) at moderate altitude. However, given that R(T) at moderate altitude increases RPE, it is prudent to monitor internal load when using the MPV to best determine the actual physiological stress of the session. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7739744/ /pubmed/33344975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2019.00052 Text en Copyright © 2019 Rodríguez-Zamora, Padial, Schoenfeld and Feriche. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Rodríguez-Zamora, Lara
Padial, Paulino
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
Feriche, Belén
Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude
title Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude
title_full Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude
title_fullStr Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude
title_full_unstemmed Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude
title_short Mean Propulsive Velocity Is a Viable Method for Adjusting the Resistance-Training Load at Moderate Altitude
title_sort mean propulsive velocity is a viable method for adjusting the resistance-training load at moderate altitude
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2019.00052
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezzamoralara meanpropulsivevelocityisaviablemethodforadjustingtheresistancetrainingloadatmoderatealtitude
AT padialpaulino meanpropulsivevelocityisaviablemethodforadjustingtheresistancetrainingloadatmoderatealtitude
AT schoenfeldbradjon meanpropulsivevelocityisaviablemethodforadjustingtheresistancetrainingloadatmoderatealtitude
AT ferichebelen meanpropulsivevelocityisaviablemethodforadjustingtheresistancetrainingloadatmoderatealtitude