Cargando…

Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm for the detection and timing of foot contact/off timing for each lateral repetition and assess the validity/reliability of the calculated timings. Methods: Participants performed a modified Edgren Side Step Test in which they moved later...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, Wilshaw R., Anderson, Anthony M., Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.563809
_version_ 1783623394838708224
author Stevens, Wilshaw R.
Anderson, Anthony M.
Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten
author_facet Stevens, Wilshaw R.
Anderson, Anthony M.
Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten
author_sort Stevens, Wilshaw R.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm for the detection and timing of foot contact/off timing for each lateral repetition and assess the validity/reliability of the calculated timings. Methods: Participants performed a modified Edgren Side Step Test in which they moved laterally along a 4-m path as quickly as possible while wearing an accelerometer on each ankle. Time of completion of each attempt was recorded using a stopwatch and digital video was obtained. Accelerometer-based (ACC) events were determined for the start of the test (START), foot contact at the end-line (FC) and the lifting of the foot when transitioning to the other direction (FO). Based on these ACC events the Overall, Split (ST) and Lag (LT) times were determined and compared to either the stopwatch or video-based timings (p < 0.05). The ACC event criterion was then applied by independent reviewers to assess inter/intra-rater reliability of identifying the events. Results: There was no significant difference in ACC (12.37 ± 2.19 s) based Overall Time compared to the Stopwatch (12.42 ± 2.25 s, p = 0.34). Bland-Altman plots for ST and LT revealed very good agreement between the ACC time to the Video (ST: Bias = 0.11 s, LOA −0.57 to 0.79; LT: Bias = −0.11 s, LOA −0.43 to 0.22). Intra and inter-rater reliability was moderate to excellent for all reviewer identified events. Conclusions: This study demonstrates methodology to identify ACC based timings during an agility test. The inclusion of an accelerometer supplements standard timing options with the added benefit of assessing sided split and lag times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77397692020-12-17 Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing Stevens, Wilshaw R. Anderson, Anthony M. Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm for the detection and timing of foot contact/off timing for each lateral repetition and assess the validity/reliability of the calculated timings. Methods: Participants performed a modified Edgren Side Step Test in which they moved laterally along a 4-m path as quickly as possible while wearing an accelerometer on each ankle. Time of completion of each attempt was recorded using a stopwatch and digital video was obtained. Accelerometer-based (ACC) events were determined for the start of the test (START), foot contact at the end-line (FC) and the lifting of the foot when transitioning to the other direction (FO). Based on these ACC events the Overall, Split (ST) and Lag (LT) times were determined and compared to either the stopwatch or video-based timings (p < 0.05). The ACC event criterion was then applied by independent reviewers to assess inter/intra-rater reliability of identifying the events. Results: There was no significant difference in ACC (12.37 ± 2.19 s) based Overall Time compared to the Stopwatch (12.42 ± 2.25 s, p = 0.34). Bland-Altman plots for ST and LT revealed very good agreement between the ACC time to the Video (ST: Bias = 0.11 s, LOA −0.57 to 0.79; LT: Bias = −0.11 s, LOA −0.43 to 0.22). Intra and inter-rater reliability was moderate to excellent for all reviewer identified events. Conclusions: This study demonstrates methodology to identify ACC based timings during an agility test. The inclusion of an accelerometer supplements standard timing options with the added benefit of assessing sided split and lag times. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7739769/ /pubmed/33345120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.563809 Text en Copyright © 2020 Stevens, Anderson and Tulchin-Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Stevens, Wilshaw R.
Anderson, Anthony M.
Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten
Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing
title Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing
title_full Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing
title_fullStr Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing
title_short Validation of Accelerometry Data to Identify Movement Patterns During Agility Testing
title_sort validation of accelerometry data to identify movement patterns during agility testing
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.563809
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenswilshawr validationofaccelerometrydatatoidentifymovementpatternsduringagilitytesting
AT andersonanthonym validationofaccelerometrydatatoidentifymovementpatternsduringagilitytesting
AT tulchinfranciskirsten validationofaccelerometrydatatoidentifymovementpatternsduringagilitytesting