Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles

Despite advances in cancer treatment, many survivors face a significant challenge of cancer-related lymphedema, together with aging. Aging results in structural changes in the lymphatic system. Beginning in 1998, tools have been developed at the University of Missouri to assess symptoms of lymphedem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oyewusi, Christiana, Armer, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.649
_version_ 1783623467842666496
author Oyewusi, Christiana
Armer, Jane
author_facet Oyewusi, Christiana
Armer, Jane
author_sort Oyewusi, Christiana
collection PubMed
description Despite advances in cancer treatment, many survivors face a significant challenge of cancer-related lymphedema, together with aging. Aging results in structural changes in the lymphatic system. Beginning in 1998, tools have been developed at the University of Missouri to assess symptoms of lymphedema in cancer patients. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence regarding use of Missouri lymphedema symptom assessment tools in original research and review articles. A search of six electronic databases was conducted for articles published within 1998 and 2018 on review and use of the tools which are Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ), Melanoma and Lymphedema Questionnaire (MELQ), and Gynecologic Cancer and Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ). In all, 210 articles were retrieved, and 32 full-text articles meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The studies reported a cumulative number of 5,872 study participants. Most manuscripts (70.97%) reported data on breast cancer lymphedema, 19.35% on gynecological cancer lymphedema, 3.23% on breast cancer and melanoma lymphedema, and 6.45% on melanoma. The use of LBCQ was reportedly more than the use of GCLQ and MELQ. Tool reliability ranged from r = 0.785 - 0.82 for LBCQ and 0.95 for internal reliability for GCLQ. The tools have been used in many countries including the United States of America. The importance of using valid and reliable quantitative measures in lymphedema symptom assessment across diverse populations and sites cannot be overstated. The tools have been modified and used over the past 20 years in various settings and across languages and cultures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7740166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77401662020-12-21 A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles Oyewusi, Christiana Armer, Jane Innov Aging Abstracts Despite advances in cancer treatment, many survivors face a significant challenge of cancer-related lymphedema, together with aging. Aging results in structural changes in the lymphatic system. Beginning in 1998, tools have been developed at the University of Missouri to assess symptoms of lymphedema in cancer patients. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence regarding use of Missouri lymphedema symptom assessment tools in original research and review articles. A search of six electronic databases was conducted for articles published within 1998 and 2018 on review and use of the tools which are Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ), Melanoma and Lymphedema Questionnaire (MELQ), and Gynecologic Cancer and Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ). In all, 210 articles were retrieved, and 32 full-text articles meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The studies reported a cumulative number of 5,872 study participants. Most manuscripts (70.97%) reported data on breast cancer lymphedema, 19.35% on gynecological cancer lymphedema, 3.23% on breast cancer and melanoma lymphedema, and 6.45% on melanoma. The use of LBCQ was reportedly more than the use of GCLQ and MELQ. Tool reliability ranged from r = 0.785 - 0.82 for LBCQ and 0.95 for internal reliability for GCLQ. The tools have been used in many countries including the United States of America. The importance of using valid and reliable quantitative measures in lymphedema symptom assessment across diverse populations and sites cannot be overstated. The tools have been modified and used over the past 20 years in various settings and across languages and cultures. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7740166/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.649 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Oyewusi, Christiana
Armer, Jane
A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles
title A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles
title_full A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles
title_short A Systematic Review of Missouri Lymphedema Symptom Assessment Tools in Original Research and Review Articles
title_sort systematic review of missouri lymphedema symptom assessment tools in original research and review articles
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.649
work_keys_str_mv AT oyewusichristiana asystematicreviewofmissourilymphedemasymptomassessmenttoolsinoriginalresearchandreviewarticles
AT armerjane asystematicreviewofmissourilymphedemasymptomassessmenttoolsinoriginalresearchandreviewarticles
AT oyewusichristiana systematicreviewofmissourilymphedemasymptomassessmenttoolsinoriginalresearchandreviewarticles
AT armerjane systematicreviewofmissourilymphedemasymptomassessmenttoolsinoriginalresearchandreviewarticles