Cargando…

Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research

Intersectionality is a useful method (Lutz, 2015) for interdisciplinary long-term care (LTC) research to advance a more critical understanding of how experiences of quality are shaped by mutually reproducing social divisions, identities and relations of power that shape LTC. This paper discusses ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aubrecht, Katie, Bourgeault, Ivy, Daly, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740403/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.127
_version_ 1783623523215867904
author Aubrecht, Katie
Bourgeault, Ivy
Daly, Tamara
author_facet Aubrecht, Katie
Bourgeault, Ivy
Daly, Tamara
author_sort Aubrecht, Katie
collection PubMed
description Intersectionality is a useful method (Lutz, 2015) for interdisciplinary long-term care (LTC) research to advance a more critical understanding of how experiences of quality are shaped by mutually reproducing social divisions, identities and relations of power that shape LTC. This paper discusses insights from the “Mapping Care Relationships” stream of the Seniors – Adding Life to Years (SALTY) project, a pan-Canadian program of research examining clinical, social and policy perspectives on quality in LTC. “Mapping Care Relationships” mapped how promising approaches to care relationships are organized and experienced in LTC. From January 2018-August 2019 our team of nine researchers conducted rapid ethnographies in eight nursing homes, two in each of four provinces across Canada. We purposively observed and interviewed workers from a wide variety of positions and backgrounds, informed by an intersectionality approach. We traced how promising approaches in person-centred dementia care (PCDC) in particular may reify the subordinated status of care workers (some more than others) and reinforce inequities within LTC systems. In multiple LTC homes, front-line care workers described experiencing physical and emotional harm in care relationships with residents which caused them distress. However, consistent with a PCDC approach, the harm was attributed to ‘behaviours’ clinically symptomatic of dementia. In framing power differentials from a medical perspective, PCDC makes it possible to interpret harmful experiences as 'part of the job’ and something workers should know to expect, prevent, avoid, redirect, or ignore. Lutz, H. (2015). Intersectionality as method. DiGeSt. Journal of diversity and gender studies, 2(1-2), 39-44.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7740403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77404032020-12-21 Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research Aubrecht, Katie Bourgeault, Ivy Daly, Tamara Innov Aging Abstracts Intersectionality is a useful method (Lutz, 2015) for interdisciplinary long-term care (LTC) research to advance a more critical understanding of how experiences of quality are shaped by mutually reproducing social divisions, identities and relations of power that shape LTC. This paper discusses insights from the “Mapping Care Relationships” stream of the Seniors – Adding Life to Years (SALTY) project, a pan-Canadian program of research examining clinical, social and policy perspectives on quality in LTC. “Mapping Care Relationships” mapped how promising approaches to care relationships are organized and experienced in LTC. From January 2018-August 2019 our team of nine researchers conducted rapid ethnographies in eight nursing homes, two in each of four provinces across Canada. We purposively observed and interviewed workers from a wide variety of positions and backgrounds, informed by an intersectionality approach. We traced how promising approaches in person-centred dementia care (PCDC) in particular may reify the subordinated status of care workers (some more than others) and reinforce inequities within LTC systems. In multiple LTC homes, front-line care workers described experiencing physical and emotional harm in care relationships with residents which caused them distress. However, consistent with a PCDC approach, the harm was attributed to ‘behaviours’ clinically symptomatic of dementia. In framing power differentials from a medical perspective, PCDC makes it possible to interpret harmful experiences as 'part of the job’ and something workers should know to expect, prevent, avoid, redirect, or ignore. Lutz, H. (2015). Intersectionality as method. DiGeSt. Journal of diversity and gender studies, 2(1-2), 39-44. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7740403/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.127 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Aubrecht, Katie
Bourgeault, Ivy
Daly, Tamara
Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research
title Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research
title_full Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research
title_fullStr Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research
title_full_unstemmed Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research
title_short Intersectionality: Mapping Critical Relations for Quality in Long-Term Care Research
title_sort intersectionality: mapping critical relations for quality in long-term care research
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740403/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.127
work_keys_str_mv AT aubrechtkatie intersectionalitymappingcriticalrelationsforqualityinlongtermcareresearch
AT bourgeaultivy intersectionalitymappingcriticalrelationsforqualityinlongtermcareresearch
AT dalytamara intersectionalitymappingcriticalrelationsforqualityinlongtermcareresearch