Cargando…

Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of a pilot co-management model for patients 65 years and older that were referred by their surgical oncologist for a comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 9 patients. Patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Megha, Chow, Stephanie, Munoz, Lizette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740586/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.481
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of a pilot co-management model for patients 65 years and older that were referred by their surgical oncologist for a comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 9 patients. Patients’ pre-operative Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty index were measured. Additional measures included advanced care planning (ACP) documentation and whether patients transferred primary care. Post-operative courses and complications were followed, including length of stay (LOS) and discharge outcomes. Results: A total of 9 patient charts were reviewed. The average age was 79 years. The average CCI and frailty indices were 9 and 4, respectively. Every patient had ACP during the initial assessment. Five patients had multiple outpatient geriatrician visits. Of the 9 referrals, 7 proceeded with surgery. LOS ranged from 6 – 22 days, with a median and average of 8 and 11 days, respectively. Of those undergoing surgery, 4 had an inpatient geriatrics consult. Complications included 1 mortality, 2 aborted cases and 4 with other complications. Four patients were discharged to previous living situations and 2 to SAR. Two patients had one ED/UC visit and 2 had multiple readmissions. No patients transferred their primary care. Conclusion: This is a small pilot showing a promising collaboration between geriatrics and surgical oncology. It outlines a supportive framework for initial and peri-operative geriatric assessments with favorable experiences for both providers. More studies are necessary to make clinical associations with this co-management model.