Cargando…

Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of a pilot co-management model for patients 65 years and older that were referred by their surgical oncologist for a comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 9 patients. Patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Megha, Chow, Stephanie, Munoz, Lizette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740586/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.481
_version_ 1783623565907591168
author Patel, Megha
Chow, Stephanie
Munoz, Lizette
author_facet Patel, Megha
Chow, Stephanie
Munoz, Lizette
author_sort Patel, Megha
collection PubMed
description Purpose: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of a pilot co-management model for patients 65 years and older that were referred by their surgical oncologist for a comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 9 patients. Patients’ pre-operative Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty index were measured. Additional measures included advanced care planning (ACP) documentation and whether patients transferred primary care. Post-operative courses and complications were followed, including length of stay (LOS) and discharge outcomes. Results: A total of 9 patient charts were reviewed. The average age was 79 years. The average CCI and frailty indices were 9 and 4, respectively. Every patient had ACP during the initial assessment. Five patients had multiple outpatient geriatrician visits. Of the 9 referrals, 7 proceeded with surgery. LOS ranged from 6 – 22 days, with a median and average of 8 and 11 days, respectively. Of those undergoing surgery, 4 had an inpatient geriatrics consult. Complications included 1 mortality, 2 aborted cases and 4 with other complications. Four patients were discharged to previous living situations and 2 to SAR. Two patients had one ED/UC visit and 2 had multiple readmissions. No patients transferred their primary care. Conclusion: This is a small pilot showing a promising collaboration between geriatrics and surgical oncology. It outlines a supportive framework for initial and peri-operative geriatric assessments with favorable experiences for both providers. More studies are necessary to make clinical associations with this co-management model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7740586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77405862020-12-21 Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program Patel, Megha Chow, Stephanie Munoz, Lizette Innov Aging Abstracts Purpose: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of a pilot co-management model for patients 65 years and older that were referred by their surgical oncologist for a comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 9 patients. Patients’ pre-operative Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty index were measured. Additional measures included advanced care planning (ACP) documentation and whether patients transferred primary care. Post-operative courses and complications were followed, including length of stay (LOS) and discharge outcomes. Results: A total of 9 patient charts were reviewed. The average age was 79 years. The average CCI and frailty indices were 9 and 4, respectively. Every patient had ACP during the initial assessment. Five patients had multiple outpatient geriatrician visits. Of the 9 referrals, 7 proceeded with surgery. LOS ranged from 6 – 22 days, with a median and average of 8 and 11 days, respectively. Of those undergoing surgery, 4 had an inpatient geriatrics consult. Complications included 1 mortality, 2 aborted cases and 4 with other complications. Four patients were discharged to previous living situations and 2 to SAR. Two patients had one ED/UC visit and 2 had multiple readmissions. No patients transferred their primary care. Conclusion: This is a small pilot showing a promising collaboration between geriatrics and surgical oncology. It outlines a supportive framework for initial and peri-operative geriatric assessments with favorable experiences for both providers. More studies are necessary to make clinical associations with this co-management model. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7740586/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.481 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Patel, Megha
Chow, Stephanie
Munoz, Lizette
Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program
title Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program
title_full Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program
title_fullStr Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program
title_full_unstemmed Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program
title_short Pilot Study of a Surgical-Oncology Geriatric Co-Management Program
title_sort pilot study of a surgical-oncology geriatric co-management program
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740586/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.481
work_keys_str_mv AT patelmegha pilotstudyofasurgicaloncologygeriatriccomanagementprogram
AT chowstephanie pilotstudyofasurgicaloncologygeriatriccomanagementprogram
AT munozlizette pilotstudyofasurgicaloncologygeriatriccomanagementprogram