Cargando…

Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community

Older adults tend to need assistance for ambulation with the progression of aging or when suffering from diseases. With technological advances, servo-assistive robotic rollators are available besides canes and walkers to assist disabled older adults. This study aimed to investigate the appropriate p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamanaka, Takashi, Kidana, Kiwami, Mizuki, Maiko, Matsui, Toshihumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740664/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.625
_version_ 1783623584000770048
author Yamanaka, Takashi
Kidana, Kiwami
Mizuki, Maiko
Matsui, Toshihumi
author_facet Yamanaka, Takashi
Kidana, Kiwami
Mizuki, Maiko
Matsui, Toshihumi
author_sort Yamanaka, Takashi
collection PubMed
description Older adults tend to need assistance for ambulation with the progression of aging or when suffering from diseases. With technological advances, servo-assistive robotic rollators are available besides canes and walkers to assist disabled older adults. This study aimed to investigate the appropriate person and conditions for using a servo-assistive robotic rollator and its effects. Participants were 10 older adults living in the community (80.5±9.7 years; 4 males and 6 females) who used a servo-assistive robotic rollator (RT.2). After evaluating their physical (body composition, diseases, care need level, and SF-36), mental (MMSE, GDS-15, and WHO-5), and living conditions, they began using the device in daily life. We evaluated their ways of using it and the effects of its use through our observation and their self-report. Participants suffered from a stroke, spinal bone fracture, Parkinson’s disease, osteoarthritis of the knees, or optic neuromyelitis. At the study’s onset, cognitive impairment (MMSE<23/30), depressive states (GDS-15≧5), decreased grip strength, and decreased muscle mass (InBody S10) was found in one, three, six, and one participant, respectively. Most participants had a clear purpose for using it, such as going outside by foot or maintaining muscle strength. During the three-month observation period, no participant fell while using it. Some participants used it in a rehabilitation program at home, while others used it in daily life and went to several places with its assistance. Servo-assistive Robotic Rollators enabled older adults with difficulty in ambulation to walk outside safely and provided a greater opportunity to participate in society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7740664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77406642020-12-21 Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community Yamanaka, Takashi Kidana, Kiwami Mizuki, Maiko Matsui, Toshihumi Innov Aging Abstracts Older adults tend to need assistance for ambulation with the progression of aging or when suffering from diseases. With technological advances, servo-assistive robotic rollators are available besides canes and walkers to assist disabled older adults. This study aimed to investigate the appropriate person and conditions for using a servo-assistive robotic rollator and its effects. Participants were 10 older adults living in the community (80.5±9.7 years; 4 males and 6 females) who used a servo-assistive robotic rollator (RT.2). After evaluating their physical (body composition, diseases, care need level, and SF-36), mental (MMSE, GDS-15, and WHO-5), and living conditions, they began using the device in daily life. We evaluated their ways of using it and the effects of its use through our observation and their self-report. Participants suffered from a stroke, spinal bone fracture, Parkinson’s disease, osteoarthritis of the knees, or optic neuromyelitis. At the study’s onset, cognitive impairment (MMSE<23/30), depressive states (GDS-15≧5), decreased grip strength, and decreased muscle mass (InBody S10) was found in one, three, six, and one participant, respectively. Most participants had a clear purpose for using it, such as going outside by foot or maintaining muscle strength. During the three-month observation period, no participant fell while using it. Some participants used it in a rehabilitation program at home, while others used it in daily life and went to several places with its assistance. Servo-assistive Robotic Rollators enabled older adults with difficulty in ambulation to walk outside safely and provided a greater opportunity to participate in society. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7740664/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.625 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Yamanaka, Takashi
Kidana, Kiwami
Mizuki, Maiko
Matsui, Toshihumi
Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community
title Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community
title_full Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community
title_short Effectiveness of Servo-Assistive Robotic Rollator (RT.2) Among Older Adults Living in the Community
title_sort effectiveness of servo-assistive robotic rollator (rt.2) among older adults living in the community
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740664/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.625
work_keys_str_mv AT yamanakatakashi effectivenessofservoassistiveroboticrollatorrt2amongolderadultslivinginthecommunity
AT kidanakiwami effectivenessofservoassistiveroboticrollatorrt2amongolderadultslivinginthecommunity
AT mizukimaiko effectivenessofservoassistiveroboticrollatorrt2amongolderadultslivinginthecommunity
AT matsuitoshihumi effectivenessofservoassistiveroboticrollatorrt2amongolderadultslivinginthecommunity