Cargando…

A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women?

Approximately 80% of adults aged 50+ report a desire to stay in their homes as long as possible, or to “age in place.” Yet, as the US aging population becomes more racially and ethnically diverse, the frameworks used to describe “aging in place” will require explicit recognition of the issues specif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tucker-Seeley, Reginald, Davis, Carlene, Ahazie, Jubilee, Robi, Matti, Steinberg, Leora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740923/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.158
_version_ 1783623644653551616
author Tucker-Seeley, Reginald
Davis, Carlene
Ahazie, Jubilee
Robi, Matti
Steinberg, Leora
author_facet Tucker-Seeley, Reginald
Davis, Carlene
Ahazie, Jubilee
Robi, Matti
Steinberg, Leora
author_sort Tucker-Seeley, Reginald
collection PubMed
description Approximately 80% of adults aged 50+ report a desire to stay in their homes as long as possible, or to “age in place.” Yet, as the US aging population becomes more racially and ethnically diverse, the frameworks used to describe “aging in place” will require explicit recognition of the issues specific to racial/ethnic minorities. For example, given the intersection of historical discrimination related to race, gender, age, and lower socioeconomic status, older African American women are at increased risk for poor health outcomes as they attempt to “age in place.” We conducted a scoping review of “aging in place” studies in the US (N=479), to determine whether current “aging in place” frameworks included issues relevant to racial/ethnic minorities generally, and African American women, specifically. Our inclusion criteria for articles were as follows: 1) a definition of “aging in place”; 2) a conceptual framework related to “aging in place” and/or 3) the incorporation of racial/ethnic minorities generally and African-American women specifically in the research sample. We adapted the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework for our review to search the PubMed database for “aging in place” studies. After applying our inclusion/exclusion criteria (N=244), the findings from our review showed that approximately 40% of studies included an explicit definition of “aging in place” (N=100), but few studies focused on African American women (N=20). Future studies on “aging in place” should consider the unique challenges that African American women face as they navigate the challenges of “aging in place.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7740923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77409232020-12-21 A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women? Tucker-Seeley, Reginald Davis, Carlene Ahazie, Jubilee Robi, Matti Steinberg, Leora Innov Aging Abstracts Approximately 80% of adults aged 50+ report a desire to stay in their homes as long as possible, or to “age in place.” Yet, as the US aging population becomes more racially and ethnically diverse, the frameworks used to describe “aging in place” will require explicit recognition of the issues specific to racial/ethnic minorities. For example, given the intersection of historical discrimination related to race, gender, age, and lower socioeconomic status, older African American women are at increased risk for poor health outcomes as they attempt to “age in place.” We conducted a scoping review of “aging in place” studies in the US (N=479), to determine whether current “aging in place” frameworks included issues relevant to racial/ethnic minorities generally, and African American women, specifically. Our inclusion criteria for articles were as follows: 1) a definition of “aging in place”; 2) a conceptual framework related to “aging in place” and/or 3) the incorporation of racial/ethnic minorities generally and African-American women specifically in the research sample. We adapted the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework for our review to search the PubMed database for “aging in place” studies. After applying our inclusion/exclusion criteria (N=244), the findings from our review showed that approximately 40% of studies included an explicit definition of “aging in place” (N=100), but few studies focused on African American women (N=20). Future studies on “aging in place” should consider the unique challenges that African American women face as they navigate the challenges of “aging in place.” Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7740923/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.158 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Tucker-Seeley, Reginald
Davis, Carlene
Ahazie, Jubilee
Robi, Matti
Steinberg, Leora
A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women?
title A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women?
title_full A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women?
title_fullStr A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women?
title_full_unstemmed A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women?
title_short A Scoping Review of Aging in Place: Is the Current Literature Inclusive of African American Women?
title_sort scoping review of aging in place: is the current literature inclusive of african american women?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7740923/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.158
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerseeleyreginald ascopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT daviscarlene ascopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT ahaziejubilee ascopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT robimatti ascopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT steinbergleora ascopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT tuckerseeleyreginald scopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT daviscarlene scopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT ahaziejubilee scopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT robimatti scopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen
AT steinbergleora scopingreviewofaginginplaceisthecurrentliteratureinclusiveofafricanamericanwomen