Cargando…

Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease

Aerobic exercise is widely supported as a disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in animal models; however, its effects on cognition have been mixed in human studies, which may be attributable to inter-individual differences in aerobic fitness and cognitive responses to aerobic exe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Fang, Salisbury, Dereck, Mathiason, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741127/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.608
_version_ 1783623683866099712
author Yu, Fang
Salisbury, Dereck
Mathiason, Michelle
author_facet Yu, Fang
Salisbury, Dereck
Mathiason, Michelle
author_sort Yu, Fang
collection PubMed
description Aerobic exercise is widely supported as a disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in animal models; however, its effects on cognition have been mixed in human studies, which may be attributable to inter-individual differences in aerobic fitness and cognitive responses to aerobic exercise. This study evaluated inter-individual differences in aerobic fitness and cognitive responses to 6-month aerobic exercise in participants with AD dementia by secondarily analyzing the FIT-AD Trial data. Aerobic fitness with the shuttle walk test (SWT), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) from cycle-ergometer exercise test, and cognition with the AD Assessment Scale–Cognition (ADAS-Cog). Inter-individual differences were calculated as the differences in the standard deviation of 6-month change (SDR) in outcomes between the intervention and control groups. The sample size was 78 (77.4±6.3 years old, 15.7±2.8 years of education, 41% women). VO2max was available in 26 participants (77.7±7.1 years old, 14.8±2.6 years of education, 35% women). The results show that the SDR was 37.0, 121.1, 1.7, and 2.3 for SWT, 6MWT, VO2max, and ADAS-Cog, respectively, but there were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in these measures over six months. Our results indicate that inter-individual differences exist in aerobic fitness and cognitive responses to aerobic exercise in AD, which contributed to the favorable, but not statistically significant between-group differences in aerobic fitness and cognition. To conclude, our study is the first to demonstrate inter-individual differences in the responses to aerobic exercise in AD dementia using SDR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7741127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77411272020-12-21 Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease Yu, Fang Salisbury, Dereck Mathiason, Michelle Innov Aging Abstracts Aerobic exercise is widely supported as a disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in animal models; however, its effects on cognition have been mixed in human studies, which may be attributable to inter-individual differences in aerobic fitness and cognitive responses to aerobic exercise. This study evaluated inter-individual differences in aerobic fitness and cognitive responses to 6-month aerobic exercise in participants with AD dementia by secondarily analyzing the FIT-AD Trial data. Aerobic fitness with the shuttle walk test (SWT), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) from cycle-ergometer exercise test, and cognition with the AD Assessment Scale–Cognition (ADAS-Cog). Inter-individual differences were calculated as the differences in the standard deviation of 6-month change (SDR) in outcomes between the intervention and control groups. The sample size was 78 (77.4±6.3 years old, 15.7±2.8 years of education, 41% women). VO2max was available in 26 participants (77.7±7.1 years old, 14.8±2.6 years of education, 35% women). The results show that the SDR was 37.0, 121.1, 1.7, and 2.3 for SWT, 6MWT, VO2max, and ADAS-Cog, respectively, but there were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in these measures over six months. Our results indicate that inter-individual differences exist in aerobic fitness and cognitive responses to aerobic exercise in AD, which contributed to the favorable, but not statistically significant between-group differences in aerobic fitness and cognition. To conclude, our study is the first to demonstrate inter-individual differences in the responses to aerobic exercise in AD dementia using SDR. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7741127/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.608 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Yu, Fang
Salisbury, Dereck
Mathiason, Michelle
Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease
title Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Inter-Individual Differences in Exercise Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort inter-individual differences in exercise responses in alzheimer’s disease
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741127/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.608
work_keys_str_mv AT yufang interindividualdifferencesinexerciseresponsesinalzheimersdisease
AT salisburydereck interindividualdifferencesinexerciseresponsesinalzheimersdisease
AT mathiasonmichelle interindividualdifferencesinexerciseresponsesinalzheimersdisease