Cargando…

Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China

Two studies were conducted to validate the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China. In the first study, 474 Chinese adults (18-58) were asked to take the Chinese version of the AAS. EFA exhibited a similar factor solution as the original study, with high internal consistency and construct validity. Moreove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zhang, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741284/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1886
_version_ 1783623718313918464
author Zhang, Xin
author_facet Zhang, Xin
author_sort Zhang, Xin
collection PubMed
description Two studies were conducted to validate the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China. In the first study, 474 Chinese adults (18-58) were asked to take the Chinese version of the AAS. EFA exhibited a similar factor solution as the original study, with high internal consistency and construct validity. Moreover, in a second study, 372 Chinese adults (18-85) took the AAS and provided their estimations of the similarities between their current and their past/future self via the SIC. Results indicated that all three factors of the SIC positively related to hostile ageism, whereas succession and identity positively related to benevolent ageism and consumption negatively related to it. Additionally, past self-continuity was positively associated with hostile ageism, and future self-continuity was negatively associated with it, but neither form was associated with benevolent ageism. These results further validate the AAS in China and also provide evidence for the uniqueness of benevolent ageism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7741284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77412842020-12-21 Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China Zhang, Xin Innov Aging Abstracts Two studies were conducted to validate the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China. In the first study, 474 Chinese adults (18-58) were asked to take the Chinese version of the AAS. EFA exhibited a similar factor solution as the original study, with high internal consistency and construct validity. Moreover, in a second study, 372 Chinese adults (18-85) took the AAS and provided their estimations of the similarities between their current and their past/future self via the SIC. Results indicated that all three factors of the SIC positively related to hostile ageism, whereas succession and identity positively related to benevolent ageism and consumption negatively related to it. Additionally, past self-continuity was positively associated with hostile ageism, and future self-continuity was negatively associated with it, but neither form was associated with benevolent ageism. These results further validate the AAS in China and also provide evidence for the uniqueness of benevolent ageism. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7741284/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1886 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Zhang, Xin
Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China
title Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China
title_full Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China
title_fullStr Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China
title_short Validation of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale in China
title_sort validation of the ambivalent ageism scale in china
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741284/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1886
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxin validationoftheambivalentageismscaleinchina