Cargando…

Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care

A qualitative study based on structured interviews with 21 healthcare leaders from CCRC’s, In-Home Care Agencies, or Medicare PACE facilities was conducted. Implications of electronic assisted living technologies on caregiver workforce were assessed. The use of assisted living technology was shown t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, John, Lee, Linh, Littlejohn, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741809/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.295
_version_ 1783623840832684032
author Hall, John
Lee, Linh
Littlejohn, Joshua
author_facet Hall, John
Lee, Linh
Littlejohn, Joshua
author_sort Hall, John
collection PubMed
description A qualitative study based on structured interviews with 21 healthcare leaders from CCRC’s, In-Home Care Agencies, or Medicare PACE facilities was conducted. Implications of electronic assisted living technologies on caregiver workforce were assessed. The use of assisted living technology was shown to have implications for workforce support and the alleviation of demands on caregivers. Communication and assessment tools were also found to be useful in the reduction of caregiver stress. There is optimism regarding the effectiveness of high-tech platforms in easing caregiver burden but there is skepticism about the return on investment given the initial cost and time needed for onboarding and data organization. The lack of user-friendliness and the required time to train to use tech are also barriers. The use of technology for remote check-ins and to monitor vitals is desirable. Also predicting dementia risk and monitoring for wandering are other opportunities for tech adoption. The enthusiasm for technology is tempered with caution for who will keep tabs on remote monitoring and who bears the responsibility to respond to the information gathered. Labor shortages, time constraints, and disorganized documentation are incentives for tech adoption. High-tech solutions for would ideally be user-friendly and help reduce staff demands. Except for the prevention of re-hospitalization by monitoring vitals the benefits of adopting new tech are not perceived as cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7741809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77418092020-12-21 Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care Hall, John Lee, Linh Littlejohn, Joshua Innov Aging Abstracts A qualitative study based on structured interviews with 21 healthcare leaders from CCRC’s, In-Home Care Agencies, or Medicare PACE facilities was conducted. Implications of electronic assisted living technologies on caregiver workforce were assessed. The use of assisted living technology was shown to have implications for workforce support and the alleviation of demands on caregivers. Communication and assessment tools were also found to be useful in the reduction of caregiver stress. There is optimism regarding the effectiveness of high-tech platforms in easing caregiver burden but there is skepticism about the return on investment given the initial cost and time needed for onboarding and data organization. The lack of user-friendliness and the required time to train to use tech are also barriers. The use of technology for remote check-ins and to monitor vitals is desirable. Also predicting dementia risk and monitoring for wandering are other opportunities for tech adoption. The enthusiasm for technology is tempered with caution for who will keep tabs on remote monitoring and who bears the responsibility to respond to the information gathered. Labor shortages, time constraints, and disorganized documentation are incentives for tech adoption. High-tech solutions for would ideally be user-friendly and help reduce staff demands. Except for the prevention of re-hospitalization by monitoring vitals the benefits of adopting new tech are not perceived as cost-effective. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7741809/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.295 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hall, John
Lee, Linh
Littlejohn, Joshua
Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care
title Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care
title_full Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care
title_fullStr Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care
title_short Electronic Assisted Living Technology in CCRC, Assisted Living, and In-Home Care
title_sort electronic assisted living technology in ccrc, assisted living, and in-home care
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741809/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.295
work_keys_str_mv AT halljohn electronicassistedlivingtechnologyinccrcassistedlivingandinhomecare
AT leelinh electronicassistedlivingtechnologyinccrcassistedlivingandinhomecare
AT littlejohnjoshua electronicassistedlivingtechnologyinccrcassistedlivingandinhomecare