Cargando…

Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach

Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walden, Allison, Robertson, Anna, Lag, Madeline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742125/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3299
_version_ 1783623914376658944
author Walden, Allison
Robertson, Anna
Lag, Madeline
author_facet Walden, Allison
Robertson, Anna
Lag, Madeline
author_sort Walden, Allison
collection PubMed
description Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associated with poorer performance on neurocognitive tests. Personality is an additional factor, as evidence demonstrates that neuroticism may predict subjective memory decline. More research is needed to understand how factors such as demographics, personality traits, and subjective health impact subjective memory. The present study applies a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to identify constructs that predict how individuals view subjective memory decline compared to others their age. Researchers used a national database, Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), due to its comprehensive and diverse sample (N = 3,291). Predictor variables pertained to demographics, personality traits, as well as physical and mental health self-reports, and the outcome variable captured subjective memory relative to one’s peers. A three-step hierarchical regression model indicated that demographic variables, personality traits, and self-evaluated health significantly contributed to 26.7% of the variance of self-evaluated memory compared to others their age, F(35, 2836) = 29.48, p < .001, with each block incrementally adding to the significance of the findings. Results suggest that subjective evaluation of physical health, personality traits, and demographic variables uniquely influence subjective memory decline relative to others of the same age. Awareness of how biopsychosocial factors may contribute to affective symptoms may have implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological testing results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7742125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77421252020-12-21 Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach Walden, Allison Robertson, Anna Lag, Madeline Innov Aging Abstracts Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associated with poorer performance on neurocognitive tests. Personality is an additional factor, as evidence demonstrates that neuroticism may predict subjective memory decline. More research is needed to understand how factors such as demographics, personality traits, and subjective health impact subjective memory. The present study applies a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to identify constructs that predict how individuals view subjective memory decline compared to others their age. Researchers used a national database, Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), due to its comprehensive and diverse sample (N = 3,291). Predictor variables pertained to demographics, personality traits, as well as physical and mental health self-reports, and the outcome variable captured subjective memory relative to one’s peers. A three-step hierarchical regression model indicated that demographic variables, personality traits, and self-evaluated health significantly contributed to 26.7% of the variance of self-evaluated memory compared to others their age, F(35, 2836) = 29.48, p < .001, with each block incrementally adding to the significance of the findings. Results suggest that subjective evaluation of physical health, personality traits, and demographic variables uniquely influence subjective memory decline relative to others of the same age. Awareness of how biopsychosocial factors may contribute to affective symptoms may have implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological testing results. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7742125/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3299 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Walden, Allison
Robertson, Anna
Lag, Madeline
Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach
title Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach
title_full Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach
title_fullStr Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach
title_short Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach
title_sort understanding subjective comparison of memory to peers: a biopsychosocial approach
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742125/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3299
work_keys_str_mv AT waldenallison understandingsubjectivecomparisonofmemorytopeersabiopsychosocialapproach
AT robertsonanna understandingsubjectivecomparisonofmemorytopeersabiopsychosocialapproach
AT lagmadeline understandingsubjectivecomparisonofmemorytopeersabiopsychosocialapproach