Cargando…

Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population

Patient safety including falls risk, is a high priority and an increasing challenge for all health care facilities. Safety risk factors include both physical factors and psychological factors. One common strategy to increase safety has been the use of “sitters.”. Studies on functions and outcomes ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kresevic, Denise, Burant, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742167/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.971
_version_ 1783623924195524608
author Kresevic, Denise
Burant, Christopher
author_facet Kresevic, Denise
Burant, Christopher
author_sort Kresevic, Denise
collection PubMed
description Patient safety including falls risk, is a high priority and an increasing challenge for all health care facilities. Safety risk factors include both physical factors and psychological factors. One common strategy to increase safety has been the use of “sitters.”. Studies on functions and outcomes are conflicting some have reported no differences in falls, decreases in falls and restraints, and increases in falls. A total survey sample of 22 “sitters” and 56 registered nurses conducted at a large midwestern VA facility to assess perceptions of sitters. Groups were similar in ages (41-50 years) with sitters having slightly more experience (11-20 years) versus nurses (6-10 years). Safety conditions most likely to be identified with sitter usage were delirium, elopement, and being a hospice patient. Sitters were more likely to identify falls risk, sitters 63% of time versus RN perception 30.9% (Chi Square=7.0, df=l, p=.008); dementia 59% vs 13% (Chi square=17.15, df=1, p=.001); and weakness 66.7% vs 18.2% (Chi square=16.54, df=1, p=.001). Sitters were more likely to have training in delirium 55% vs nurses, 34% (Chi sq=2.557, df=1 p=.11). Nurses identified that the use of sitters were very likely to prevent falls 29.8%, calm patients 25.2%, maintain lines 25.2%, prevent elopement 30.5% and redirect patients 29.7%. Nurses identified the following available safety strategies: alarms (67.2%), adjusting assignment (47.2%), music therapy (5.4%), use of restraints (<2%), pet therapy (<2%), and video monitoring (<1%). Implementation of safety programs must address availability of multiple strategies including: matching sitter competencies with patient populations served.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7742167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77421672020-12-21 Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population Kresevic, Denise Burant, Christopher Innov Aging Abstracts Patient safety including falls risk, is a high priority and an increasing challenge for all health care facilities. Safety risk factors include both physical factors and psychological factors. One common strategy to increase safety has been the use of “sitters.”. Studies on functions and outcomes are conflicting some have reported no differences in falls, decreases in falls and restraints, and increases in falls. A total survey sample of 22 “sitters” and 56 registered nurses conducted at a large midwestern VA facility to assess perceptions of sitters. Groups were similar in ages (41-50 years) with sitters having slightly more experience (11-20 years) versus nurses (6-10 years). Safety conditions most likely to be identified with sitter usage were delirium, elopement, and being a hospice patient. Sitters were more likely to identify falls risk, sitters 63% of time versus RN perception 30.9% (Chi Square=7.0, df=l, p=.008); dementia 59% vs 13% (Chi square=17.15, df=1, p=.001); and weakness 66.7% vs 18.2% (Chi square=16.54, df=1, p=.001). Sitters were more likely to have training in delirium 55% vs nurses, 34% (Chi sq=2.557, df=1 p=.11). Nurses identified that the use of sitters were very likely to prevent falls 29.8%, calm patients 25.2%, maintain lines 25.2%, prevent elopement 30.5% and redirect patients 29.7%. Nurses identified the following available safety strategies: alarms (67.2%), adjusting assignment (47.2%), music therapy (5.4%), use of restraints (<2%), pet therapy (<2%), and video monitoring (<1%). Implementation of safety programs must address availability of multiple strategies including: matching sitter competencies with patient populations served. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7742167/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.971 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kresevic, Denise
Burant, Christopher
Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population
title Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population
title_full Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population
title_fullStr Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population
title_full_unstemmed Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population
title_short Use of Sitters for Patient Safety in a Veteran Population
title_sort use of sitters for patient safety in a veteran population
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742167/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.971
work_keys_str_mv AT kresevicdenise useofsittersforpatientsafetyinaveteranpopulation
AT burantchristopher useofsittersforpatientsafetyinaveteranpopulation