Cargando…

Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?

The automobile industry in South Korea has rapidly expanded for the last half century. The current generation of older adults is the first generation that has experienced mass car ownership and also faced challenges related to driving cessation due to geriatric syndromes. This study aimed to explore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Choi, Moon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742417/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1505
_version_ 1783623983399174144
author Choi, Moon
author_facet Choi, Moon
author_sort Choi, Moon
collection PubMed
description The automobile industry in South Korea has rapidly expanded for the last half century. The current generation of older adults is the first generation that has experienced mass car ownership and also faced challenges related to driving cessation due to geriatric syndromes. This study aimed to explore diversity in reasons for driving private vehicles among Korean older adults. Data came from a nationally representative survey on adults aged 65 years and older conducted in August, 2019 (N=1,500; women 57.1%). One out of four respondents (24.5%) reported driving, and the current drivers were categorized into four groups by primary reason for driving: (a) for convenience, (b) for caregiving, (c) for survival (due to the lack of public transport) and (d) for living (i.e. taxi or bus driver). The results showed that current drivers were more likely to be men, younger and more educated compared to non-drivers. Conspicuously, those who reported driving for their family members with mobility needs were the second largest group after those who reported driving for convenience such as for grocery shopping (34.6% and 43.6%, respectively). The results of multinomial logistic regression model showed that older age, living in rural areas and poorer self-rated health were associated with driving for survival as compared to driving for convenience. About the odds of driving for caregiving compared to driving for convenience were higher for those married and living with their spouse than for those not-married. The results imply the importance of considering diversity in developing public policies for older drivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7742417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77424172020-12-21 Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury? Choi, Moon Innov Aging Abstracts The automobile industry in South Korea has rapidly expanded for the last half century. The current generation of older adults is the first generation that has experienced mass car ownership and also faced challenges related to driving cessation due to geriatric syndromes. This study aimed to explore diversity in reasons for driving private vehicles among Korean older adults. Data came from a nationally representative survey on adults aged 65 years and older conducted in August, 2019 (N=1,500; women 57.1%). One out of four respondents (24.5%) reported driving, and the current drivers were categorized into four groups by primary reason for driving: (a) for convenience, (b) for caregiving, (c) for survival (due to the lack of public transport) and (d) for living (i.e. taxi or bus driver). The results showed that current drivers were more likely to be men, younger and more educated compared to non-drivers. Conspicuously, those who reported driving for their family members with mobility needs were the second largest group after those who reported driving for convenience such as for grocery shopping (34.6% and 43.6%, respectively). The results of multinomial logistic regression model showed that older age, living in rural areas and poorer self-rated health were associated with driving for survival as compared to driving for convenience. About the odds of driving for caregiving compared to driving for convenience were higher for those married and living with their spouse than for those not-married. The results imply the importance of considering diversity in developing public policies for older drivers. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7742417/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1505 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Choi, Moon
Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?
title Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?
title_full Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?
title_fullStr Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?
title_full_unstemmed Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?
title_short Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?
title_sort driving private vehicles in later life: necessity or luxury?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742417/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1505
work_keys_str_mv AT choimoon drivingprivatevehiclesinlaterlifenecessityorluxury