Cargando…

Aging Clocks

While chronological age is arguably the strongest risk factor for death, disease, and disability, same-aged individuals remain heterogeneous in their susceptibilities to these various outcomes. One explanation is that chronological age is an imperfect proxy of the degree of biological aging an indiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Levine, Morgan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742524/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2982
_version_ 1783624008669855744
author Levine, Morgan
author_facet Levine, Morgan
author_sort Levine, Morgan
collection PubMed
description While chronological age is arguably the strongest risk factor for death, disease, and disability, same-aged individuals remain heterogeneous in their susceptibilities to these various outcomes. One explanation is that chronological age is an imperfect proxy of the degree of biological aging an individual has undergone. Thus, defining measurable estimates of ‘biological age’ (in contrast to chronological age) has become a major initiative in Geroscience research. Such biomarkers of aging, or ‘aging clocks’ will 1) help identify underlying mechanisms of aging, 2) enable identification of at-risk individuals prior to disease onset, and 3) provide outcomes to assess efficacy of interventions. In this session, I will describe the various aging clocks, how they were developed, and what they track. I will also describe how aging clocks can facilitate research both within and outside of the biological sciences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7742524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77425242020-12-21 Aging Clocks Levine, Morgan Innov Aging Abstracts While chronological age is arguably the strongest risk factor for death, disease, and disability, same-aged individuals remain heterogeneous in their susceptibilities to these various outcomes. One explanation is that chronological age is an imperfect proxy of the degree of biological aging an individual has undergone. Thus, defining measurable estimates of ‘biological age’ (in contrast to chronological age) has become a major initiative in Geroscience research. Such biomarkers of aging, or ‘aging clocks’ will 1) help identify underlying mechanisms of aging, 2) enable identification of at-risk individuals prior to disease onset, and 3) provide outcomes to assess efficacy of interventions. In this session, I will describe the various aging clocks, how they were developed, and what they track. I will also describe how aging clocks can facilitate research both within and outside of the biological sciences. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7742524/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2982 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Levine, Morgan
Aging Clocks
title Aging Clocks
title_full Aging Clocks
title_fullStr Aging Clocks
title_full_unstemmed Aging Clocks
title_short Aging Clocks
title_sort aging clocks
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742524/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2982
work_keys_str_mv AT levinemorgan agingclocks