Cargando…

Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences

This presentation will emphasize the importance of plain, good writing. Editors of high impact journals read 10 or more manuscripts per week, and are under pressure to reject 80-90% of them. Regardless of scholarly quality, if the point and contribution are not clear in a quick scan of the paper, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Meeks, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742921/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3161
_version_ 1783624099836198912
author Meeks, Suzanne
author_facet Meeks, Suzanne
author_sort Meeks, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description This presentation will emphasize the importance of plain, good writing. Editors of high impact journals read 10 or more manuscripts per week, and are under pressure to reject 80-90% of them. Regardless of scholarly quality, if the point and contribution are not clear in a quick scan of the paper, it likely will not be reviewed favorably. I will provide tips for strong scientific writing that are commonly violated in manuscript submissions, and provide references for additional writing support. I will also discuss some common publication ethics issues that arise during the review process, including author contributions and embedding your scholarship in the context of prior work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7742921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77429212020-12-21 Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences Meeks, Suzanne Innov Aging Abstracts This presentation will emphasize the importance of plain, good writing. Editors of high impact journals read 10 or more manuscripts per week, and are under pressure to reject 80-90% of them. Regardless of scholarly quality, if the point and contribution are not clear in a quick scan of the paper, it likely will not be reviewed favorably. I will provide tips for strong scientific writing that are commonly violated in manuscript submissions, and provide references for additional writing support. I will also discuss some common publication ethics issues that arise during the review process, including author contributions and embedding your scholarship in the context of prior work. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7742921/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3161 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Meeks, Suzanne
Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences
title Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences
title_full Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences
title_fullStr Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences
title_full_unstemmed Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences
title_short Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences
title_sort strong and ethical scholarly writing for multidisciplinary audiences
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742921/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3161
work_keys_str_mv AT meekssuzanne strongandethicalscholarlywritingformultidisciplinaryaudiences