Cargando…
Responding to Reviewers
An invitation to “revise and resubmit” one’s manuscript, especially for a highly competitive journal, is an important achievement. However, it is not a guarantee that a revised manuscript will ultimately be accepted for publication. I will provide insights into what differentiates a “major” versus “...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743161/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3163 |
_version_ | 1783624151707156480 |
---|---|
author | Carr, Deborah |
author_facet | Carr, Deborah |
author_sort | Carr, Deborah |
collection | PubMed |
description | An invitation to “revise and resubmit” one’s manuscript, especially for a highly competitive journal, is an important achievement. However, it is not a guarantee that a revised manuscript will ultimately be accepted for publication. I will provide insights into what differentiates a “major” versus “minor” R&R invitation, will provide background on how editors and reviewers arrive at these decisions, and will provide detailed tips for crafting a revision memo and revised manuscript that has an excellent chance of being accepted for publication (while staying within a journal’s word count limits). I will also offer suggestions for navigating revisions when reviewers offer discrepant feedback, or make suggestions that may not ultimately enhance the quality or impact of the manuscript. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7743161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77431612020-12-21 Responding to Reviewers Carr, Deborah Innov Aging Abstracts An invitation to “revise and resubmit” one’s manuscript, especially for a highly competitive journal, is an important achievement. However, it is not a guarantee that a revised manuscript will ultimately be accepted for publication. I will provide insights into what differentiates a “major” versus “minor” R&R invitation, will provide background on how editors and reviewers arrive at these decisions, and will provide detailed tips for crafting a revision memo and revised manuscript that has an excellent chance of being accepted for publication (while staying within a journal’s word count limits). I will also offer suggestions for navigating revisions when reviewers offer discrepant feedback, or make suggestions that may not ultimately enhance the quality or impact of the manuscript. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743161/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3163 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Carr, Deborah Responding to Reviewers |
title | Responding to Reviewers |
title_full | Responding to Reviewers |
title_fullStr | Responding to Reviewers |
title_full_unstemmed | Responding to Reviewers |
title_short | Responding to Reviewers |
title_sort | responding to reviewers |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743161/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrdeborah respondingtoreviewers |