Cargando…

Responding to Reviewers

An invitation to “revise and resubmit” one’s manuscript, especially for a highly competitive journal, is an important achievement. However, it is not a guarantee that a revised manuscript will ultimately be accepted for publication. I will provide insights into what differentiates a “major” versus “...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Carr, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743161/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3163
_version_ 1783624151707156480
author Carr, Deborah
author_facet Carr, Deborah
author_sort Carr, Deborah
collection PubMed
description An invitation to “revise and resubmit” one’s manuscript, especially for a highly competitive journal, is an important achievement. However, it is not a guarantee that a revised manuscript will ultimately be accepted for publication. I will provide insights into what differentiates a “major” versus “minor” R&R invitation, will provide background on how editors and reviewers arrive at these decisions, and will provide detailed tips for crafting a revision memo and revised manuscript that has an excellent chance of being accepted for publication (while staying within a journal’s word count limits). I will also offer suggestions for navigating revisions when reviewers offer discrepant feedback, or make suggestions that may not ultimately enhance the quality or impact of the manuscript.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7743161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77431612020-12-21 Responding to Reviewers Carr, Deborah Innov Aging Abstracts An invitation to “revise and resubmit” one’s manuscript, especially for a highly competitive journal, is an important achievement. However, it is not a guarantee that a revised manuscript will ultimately be accepted for publication. I will provide insights into what differentiates a “major” versus “minor” R&R invitation, will provide background on how editors and reviewers arrive at these decisions, and will provide detailed tips for crafting a revision memo and revised manuscript that has an excellent chance of being accepted for publication (while staying within a journal’s word count limits). I will also offer suggestions for navigating revisions when reviewers offer discrepant feedback, or make suggestions that may not ultimately enhance the quality or impact of the manuscript. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743161/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3163 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Carr, Deborah
Responding to Reviewers
title Responding to Reviewers
title_full Responding to Reviewers
title_fullStr Responding to Reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Responding to Reviewers
title_short Responding to Reviewers
title_sort responding to reviewers
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743161/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3163
work_keys_str_mv AT carrdeborah respondingtoreviewers