Cargando…

Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic

Rural Veterans at risk of fracture due to osteoporosis remain underdiagnosed and undertreated, in part due to location-related barriers to accessing care. Despite lowered cost and travel barriers to osteoporosis care through implementation of a telehealth model directed at rural at-risk Veterans tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steffen, Melissa, Van Tiem, Jennifer, Seaman, Aaron, Miller, Karla, Wardyn, Shylo, Solimeo, Samantha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743256/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1396
_version_ 1783624174334377984
author Steffen, Melissa
Van Tiem, Jennifer
Seaman, Aaron
Miller, Karla
Wardyn, Shylo
Solimeo, Samantha
author_facet Steffen, Melissa
Van Tiem, Jennifer
Seaman, Aaron
Miller, Karla
Wardyn, Shylo
Solimeo, Samantha
author_sort Steffen, Melissa
collection PubMed
description Rural Veterans at risk of fracture due to osteoporosis remain underdiagnosed and undertreated, in part due to location-related barriers to accessing care. Despite lowered cost and travel barriers to osteoporosis care through implementation of a telehealth model directed at rural at-risk Veterans that took advantage of many strengths of the VA’s healthcare system, only 30% of eligible Veterans accepted care. To understand low acceptance, we conducted 39 semi-structured telephone interviews with Veterans eligible for the clinic, including 19 who accepted screening and treatment, 12 who completed screening but declined treatment, and 8 who declined screening and treatment. Veterans who opted to be screened and/or treated for osteoporosis did so because: it was recommended by the VA; they were interested in learning more about their health; thought they may be at risk of osteoporosis; or believed screening would not cause them harm. Conversely, Veterans refused screening or treatment because of past negative experiences with medications, both bone and non-bone; a wish to not put anything else into their bodies; or the belief that their bone loss is not severe enough to warrant treatment. Outside medical professionals and peers influenced Veterans’ decisions to not take or alter their treatment. Cost and travel distance remained a barrier for Veterans who did not live near a VA facility with the necessary screening and treatment infrastructure. Many barriers to osteoporosis care remain despite efforts to remove them. Delivery systems must account for both instrumental and social access to care to reduce fracture risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7743256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77432562020-12-21 Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic Steffen, Melissa Van Tiem, Jennifer Seaman, Aaron Miller, Karla Wardyn, Shylo Solimeo, Samantha Innov Aging Abstracts Rural Veterans at risk of fracture due to osteoporosis remain underdiagnosed and undertreated, in part due to location-related barriers to accessing care. Despite lowered cost and travel barriers to osteoporosis care through implementation of a telehealth model directed at rural at-risk Veterans that took advantage of many strengths of the VA’s healthcare system, only 30% of eligible Veterans accepted care. To understand low acceptance, we conducted 39 semi-structured telephone interviews with Veterans eligible for the clinic, including 19 who accepted screening and treatment, 12 who completed screening but declined treatment, and 8 who declined screening and treatment. Veterans who opted to be screened and/or treated for osteoporosis did so because: it was recommended by the VA; they were interested in learning more about their health; thought they may be at risk of osteoporosis; or believed screening would not cause them harm. Conversely, Veterans refused screening or treatment because of past negative experiences with medications, both bone and non-bone; a wish to not put anything else into their bodies; or the belief that their bone loss is not severe enough to warrant treatment. Outside medical professionals and peers influenced Veterans’ decisions to not take or alter their treatment. Cost and travel distance remained a barrier for Veterans who did not live near a VA facility with the necessary screening and treatment infrastructure. Many barriers to osteoporosis care remain despite efforts to remove them. Delivery systems must account for both instrumental and social access to care to reduce fracture risk. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743256/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1396 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Steffen, Melissa
Van Tiem, Jennifer
Seaman, Aaron
Miller, Karla
Wardyn, Shylo
Solimeo, Samantha
Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic
title Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic
title_full Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic
title_fullStr Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic
title_short Patient Experience of an Osteoporosis Telemedicine Clinic
title_sort patient experience of an osteoporosis telemedicine clinic
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743256/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1396
work_keys_str_mv AT steffenmelissa patientexperienceofanosteoporosistelemedicineclinic
AT vantiemjennifer patientexperienceofanosteoporosistelemedicineclinic
AT seamanaaron patientexperienceofanosteoporosistelemedicineclinic
AT millerkarla patientexperienceofanosteoporosistelemedicineclinic
AT wardynshylo patientexperienceofanosteoporosistelemedicineclinic
AT solimeosamantha patientexperienceofanosteoporosistelemedicineclinic