Cargando…

Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis

Few studies examined race-regional influences on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia risk factors. We examined 14 risk factors in 5 race-regions, e.g. cross-sectional age- and sex-adjusted relative prevalence ratios (RPR) from multinomial regression comparing associations of low education (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Windham, B Gwen, Griswold, Michael, Henegan, James, Knopman, David, Lirette, Seth, Mielke, Michelle, Petersen, Ron, Mosley, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743294/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2828
_version_ 1783624183229448192
author Windham, B Gwen
Griswold, Michael
Henegan, James
Knopman, David
Lirette, Seth
Mielke, Michelle
Petersen, Ron
Mosley, Thomas
author_facet Windham, B Gwen
Griswold, Michael
Henegan, James
Knopman, David
Lirette, Seth
Mielke, Michelle
Petersen, Ron
Mosley, Thomas
author_sort Windham, B Gwen
collection PubMed
description Few studies examined race-regional influences on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia risk factors. We examined 14 risk factors in 5 race-regions, e.g. cross-sectional age- and sex-adjusted relative prevalence ratios (RPR) from multinomial regression comparing associations of low education (<12yrs) with MCI and dementia (versus normal cognition) across 3 race-region groups, average age 76yrs: whites in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging[MCSA, Olmsted County, MN—MCSA-MN-Whites); Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities(ARIC) whites in suburban Minneapolis, MN—ARIC-MN-Whites); ARIC-African Americans in Jackson, MS—ARIC-MS-AA. Among 3,787 MCSA-Whites, low education exerted a 2-fold risk for MCI, RPR=2.09(95%CI: 1.57,2.78). Conversely, low education was not a supported MCI risk factor for ARIC-MN-Whites (n=1,901—RPR=0.63(0.31,1.28) or ARIC-MS-AA, (n=1,416—RPR=.0.81 (0.60,1.10)), with substantially differential race-region effects. Low education RPRs for dementia also differed by race-region: RPR=4.43(2.68,7.31-MCSA-MN-W), RPR=0.70 (0.16,2.99-ARIC-MN-Whites), and RPR=2.54 (1.74,3.72-ARIC-MS-AA). Understanding why risk factors differ by race and region likely requires diverse samples and harmonized methods using culturally-appropriate assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7743294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77432942020-12-21 Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis Windham, B Gwen Griswold, Michael Henegan, James Knopman, David Lirette, Seth Mielke, Michelle Petersen, Ron Mosley, Thomas Innov Aging Abstracts Few studies examined race-regional influences on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia risk factors. We examined 14 risk factors in 5 race-regions, e.g. cross-sectional age- and sex-adjusted relative prevalence ratios (RPR) from multinomial regression comparing associations of low education (<12yrs) with MCI and dementia (versus normal cognition) across 3 race-region groups, average age 76yrs: whites in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging[MCSA, Olmsted County, MN—MCSA-MN-Whites); Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities(ARIC) whites in suburban Minneapolis, MN—ARIC-MN-Whites); ARIC-African Americans in Jackson, MS—ARIC-MS-AA. Among 3,787 MCSA-Whites, low education exerted a 2-fold risk for MCI, RPR=2.09(95%CI: 1.57,2.78). Conversely, low education was not a supported MCI risk factor for ARIC-MN-Whites (n=1,901—RPR=0.63(0.31,1.28) or ARIC-MS-AA, (n=1,416—RPR=.0.81 (0.60,1.10)), with substantially differential race-region effects. Low education RPRs for dementia also differed by race-region: RPR=4.43(2.68,7.31-MCSA-MN-W), RPR=0.70 (0.16,2.99-ARIC-MN-Whites), and RPR=2.54 (1.74,3.72-ARIC-MS-AA). Understanding why risk factors differ by race and region likely requires diverse samples and harmonized methods using culturally-appropriate assessments. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743294/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2828 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Windham, B Gwen
Griswold, Michael
Henegan, James
Knopman, David
Lirette, Seth
Mielke, Michelle
Petersen, Ron
Mosley, Thomas
Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis
title Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis
title_full Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis
title_fullStr Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis
title_short Race and Regional Differences in Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment From a Combined Cohort Analysis
title_sort race and regional differences in risk factors for cognitive impairment from a combined cohort analysis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743294/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2828
work_keys_str_mv AT windhambgwen raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis
AT griswoldmichael raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis
AT heneganjames raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis
AT knopmandavid raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis
AT liretteseth raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis
AT mielkemichelle raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis
AT petersenron raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis
AT mosleythomas raceandregionaldifferencesinriskfactorsforcognitiveimpairmentfromacombinedcohortanalysis