Cargando…
Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States
Assisted living (AL) regulations have been long recognized as being highly variable across states. A new approach developed by our team, Health Services Regulatory Analysis, allows for a more granular identification of within-state variation in AL regulation. We identified 172 licensing classificati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743474/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2523 |
_version_ | 1783624226055389184 |
---|---|
author | Carder, Paula Smith, Lindsey Bucy, Taylor Winfree, Jaclyn Zhang, Wenhan Thomas, Kali |
author_facet | Carder, Paula Smith, Lindsey Bucy, Taylor Winfree, Jaclyn Zhang, Wenhan Thomas, Kali |
author_sort | Carder, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assisted living (AL) regulations have been long recognized as being highly variable across states. A new approach developed by our team, Health Services Regulatory Analysis, allows for a more granular identification of within-state variation in AL regulation. We identified 172 licensing classifications from the 50 states and DC representing 58 primary license types, 48 sub-types, and 66 designations that can modify a primary or sub-license. Over two-thirds (72%) of dementia-specific classifications require that all staff receive initial dementia training, compared to only one-third (33%) of general AL classifications. This trend is similarly reflected in cognitive-screening requirements, present in 67% of dementia-specific classifications and 42% of general AL classifications. Regulatory theory describes how licensing agencies respond to various forces and values. Within-state AL regulatory variation reflects a combination of oversight mandates, population-specific needs (e.g., people with dementia), historic policies, and provider influence, with implications for consumers, policy-makers and researchers. Part of a symposium sponsored by Assisted Living Interest Group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7743474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77434742020-12-21 Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States Carder, Paula Smith, Lindsey Bucy, Taylor Winfree, Jaclyn Zhang, Wenhan Thomas, Kali Innov Aging Abstracts Assisted living (AL) regulations have been long recognized as being highly variable across states. A new approach developed by our team, Health Services Regulatory Analysis, allows for a more granular identification of within-state variation in AL regulation. We identified 172 licensing classifications from the 50 states and DC representing 58 primary license types, 48 sub-types, and 66 designations that can modify a primary or sub-license. Over two-thirds (72%) of dementia-specific classifications require that all staff receive initial dementia training, compared to only one-third (33%) of general AL classifications. This trend is similarly reflected in cognitive-screening requirements, present in 67% of dementia-specific classifications and 42% of general AL classifications. Regulatory theory describes how licensing agencies respond to various forces and values. Within-state AL regulatory variation reflects a combination of oversight mandates, population-specific needs (e.g., people with dementia), historic policies, and provider influence, with implications for consumers, policy-makers and researchers. Part of a symposium sponsored by Assisted Living Interest Group. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743474/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2523 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Carder, Paula Smith, Lindsey Bucy, Taylor Winfree, Jaclyn Zhang, Wenhan Thomas, Kali Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States |
title | Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States |
title_full | Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States |
title_fullStr | Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States |
title_short | Variation in Assisted Living Regulations Within and Across States |
title_sort | variation in assisted living regulations within and across states |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743474/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carderpaula variationinassistedlivingregulationswithinandacrossstates AT smithlindsey variationinassistedlivingregulationswithinandacrossstates AT bucytaylor variationinassistedlivingregulationswithinandacrossstates AT winfreejaclyn variationinassistedlivingregulationswithinandacrossstates AT zhangwenhan variationinassistedlivingregulationswithinandacrossstates AT thomaskali variationinassistedlivingregulationswithinandacrossstates |