Cargando…
Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS
Gut microbiome datasets comprise microbial taxa relative abundances that necessarily sum to 1; analysis ignoring this feature may produce misleading results. We assessed 163 genera from the first batch of Microbiome Ancillary Study (n=530) stool samples and examined associations between microbiota a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743514/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3074 |
_version_ | 1783624235548147712 |
---|---|
author | Shardell, Michelle Parimi, Neeta Langsetmo, Lisa Orwoll, Eric Shikany, James Kado, Deborah Cawthon, Peggy |
author_facet | Shardell, Michelle Parimi, Neeta Langsetmo, Lisa Orwoll, Eric Shikany, James Kado, Deborah Cawthon, Peggy |
author_sort | Shardell, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gut microbiome datasets comprise microbial taxa relative abundances that necessarily sum to 1; analysis ignoring this feature may produce misleading results. We assessed 163 genera from the first batch of Microbiome Ancillary Study (n=530) stool samples and examined associations between microbiota and body weight. We compared conventional Bayesian linear regression (BLR) and network analysis to their compositional counterparts, adjusting for past weight and other covariates. Conventional BLR identified Roseburia and Dialister (positive association) and Coprococcus-1 (negative association) after multiple comparisons adjustment(P<.0125). No conventional network module was associated with weight. Using compositional BLR, men with higher Coprococcus-2 and Acidaminococcus had higher weight, whereas men with higher Coprococcus-1 and Ruminococcus-1 had lower weight (P<.05), but findings were non-significant after multiple comparisons adjustment. Two compositional network modules with respective hub taxa Blautia and Faecalibacterium were associated with weight(P<.01). Findings depended on analytical workflow; compositional analysis is advocated to appropriately handle the sum-to-1 constraint. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7743514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77435142020-12-21 Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS Shardell, Michelle Parimi, Neeta Langsetmo, Lisa Orwoll, Eric Shikany, James Kado, Deborah Cawthon, Peggy Innov Aging Abstracts Gut microbiome datasets comprise microbial taxa relative abundances that necessarily sum to 1; analysis ignoring this feature may produce misleading results. We assessed 163 genera from the first batch of Microbiome Ancillary Study (n=530) stool samples and examined associations between microbiota and body weight. We compared conventional Bayesian linear regression (BLR) and network analysis to their compositional counterparts, adjusting for past weight and other covariates. Conventional BLR identified Roseburia and Dialister (positive association) and Coprococcus-1 (negative association) after multiple comparisons adjustment(P<.0125). No conventional network module was associated with weight. Using compositional BLR, men with higher Coprococcus-2 and Acidaminococcus had higher weight, whereas men with higher Coprococcus-1 and Ruminococcus-1 had lower weight (P<.05), but findings were non-significant after multiple comparisons adjustment. Two compositional network modules with respective hub taxa Blautia and Faecalibacterium were associated with weight(P<.01). Findings depended on analytical workflow; compositional analysis is advocated to appropriately handle the sum-to-1 constraint. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743514/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3074 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Shardell, Michelle Parimi, Neeta Langsetmo, Lisa Orwoll, Eric Shikany, James Kado, Deborah Cawthon, Peggy Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS |
title | Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS |
title_full | Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS |
title_fullStr | Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS |
title_short | Comparing Analytical Methods for Gut Microbiome and Aging: Gut Microbiota and Body Weight in the MrOS |
title_sort | comparing analytical methods for gut microbiome and aging: gut microbiota and body weight in the mros |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743514/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shardellmichelle comparinganalyticalmethodsforgutmicrobiomeandaginggutmicrobiotaandbodyweightinthemros AT parimineeta comparinganalyticalmethodsforgutmicrobiomeandaginggutmicrobiotaandbodyweightinthemros AT langsetmolisa comparinganalyticalmethodsforgutmicrobiomeandaginggutmicrobiotaandbodyweightinthemros AT orwolleric comparinganalyticalmethodsforgutmicrobiomeandaginggutmicrobiotaandbodyweightinthemros AT shikanyjames comparinganalyticalmethodsforgutmicrobiomeandaginggutmicrobiotaandbodyweightinthemros AT kadodeborah comparinganalyticalmethodsforgutmicrobiomeandaginggutmicrobiotaandbodyweightinthemros AT cawthonpeggy comparinganalyticalmethodsforgutmicrobiomeandaginggutmicrobiotaandbodyweightinthemros |