Cargando…
Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science
Some GSA journals are especially interested in promoting transparency and open science practices, reflecting how some subdisciplines in aging are moving toward open science practices faster than others. In this talk, I will consider the transparency and open science practices that seem most relevant...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743589/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3162 |
_version_ | 1783624253416931328 |
---|---|
author | Isaacowitz, Derek |
author_facet | Isaacowitz, Derek |
author_sort | Isaacowitz, Derek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some GSA journals are especially interested in promoting transparency and open science practices, reflecting how some subdisciplines in aging are moving toward open science practices faster than others. In this talk, I will consider the transparency and open science practices that seem most relevant to aging researchers, such as preregistration, open data, open materials and code, sample size justification and analytic tools for considering null effects. I will also discuss potential challenges to implementing these practices as well as reasons why it is important to do so despite these challenges. The focus will be on pragmatic suggestions for researchers planning and conducting studies now that they hope to publish later. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7743589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77435892020-12-21 Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science Isaacowitz, Derek Innov Aging Abstracts Some GSA journals are especially interested in promoting transparency and open science practices, reflecting how some subdisciplines in aging are moving toward open science practices faster than others. In this talk, I will consider the transparency and open science practices that seem most relevant to aging researchers, such as preregistration, open data, open materials and code, sample size justification and analytic tools for considering null effects. I will also discuss potential challenges to implementing these practices as well as reasons why it is important to do so despite these challenges. The focus will be on pragmatic suggestions for researchers planning and conducting studies now that they hope to publish later. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743589/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3162 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Isaacowitz, Derek Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science |
title | Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science |
title_full | Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science |
title_fullStr | Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science |
title_full_unstemmed | Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science |
title_short | Transparency, Documentation, and Open Science |
title_sort | transparency, documentation, and open science |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743589/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isaacowitzderek transparencydocumentationandopenscience |