Cargando…
Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California
The majority of aging network service providers are unprepared to deliver targeted services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) older adults. In 2017, California legislature mandated ongoing LGBT sensitivity training for congregate living providers. Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743614/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2340 |
_version_ | 1783624259220799488 |
---|---|
author | Oswald, Austin Giunta, Nancy Johnston, Tim Wayland, Sherrill |
author_facet | Oswald, Austin Giunta, Nancy Johnston, Tim Wayland, Sherrill |
author_sort | Oswald, Austin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The majority of aging network service providers are unprepared to deliver targeted services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) older adults. In 2017, California legislature mandated ongoing LGBT sensitivity training for congregate living providers. Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE) developed a specialized training, Creating Inclusive Communities, for congregate living staff to learn the unique needs of LGBT elders. This secondary data analysis compared pre-test knowledge and attitudes of training participants in two states, one mandating LGBT aging sensitivity training (California, N=328) and one without the mandate (New York, N=622). Preliminary results show that prior to receiving training, California participants demonstrate significantly less knowledge of LGBT aging issues compared to New York participants; t(948)=-3.808, p<.001. Attitudinal differences were also demonstrated. These results suggest that laws mandating LGBT sensitivity training may help reach providers with greater training needs. Policy and practice implications will be discussed. Part of a symposium sponsored by Rainbow Research Group Interest Group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7743614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77436142020-12-21 Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California Oswald, Austin Giunta, Nancy Johnston, Tim Wayland, Sherrill Innov Aging Abstracts The majority of aging network service providers are unprepared to deliver targeted services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) older adults. In 2017, California legislature mandated ongoing LGBT sensitivity training for congregate living providers. Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE) developed a specialized training, Creating Inclusive Communities, for congregate living staff to learn the unique needs of LGBT elders. This secondary data analysis compared pre-test knowledge and attitudes of training participants in two states, one mandating LGBT aging sensitivity training (California, N=328) and one without the mandate (New York, N=622). Preliminary results show that prior to receiving training, California participants demonstrate significantly less knowledge of LGBT aging issues compared to New York participants; t(948)=-3.808, p<.001. Attitudinal differences were also demonstrated. These results suggest that laws mandating LGBT sensitivity training may help reach providers with greater training needs. Policy and practice implications will be discussed. Part of a symposium sponsored by Rainbow Research Group Interest Group. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743614/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2340 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Oswald, Austin Giunta, Nancy Johnston, Tim Wayland, Sherrill Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California |
title | Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California |
title_full | Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California |
title_short | Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California |
title_sort | evaluating the impact of state policy interventions for lgbt aging: comparative case study of new york and california |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743614/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oswaldaustin evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia AT giuntanancy evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia AT johnstontim evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia AT waylandsherrill evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia |