Cargando…

Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California

The majority of aging network service providers are unprepared to deliver targeted services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) older adults. In 2017, California legislature mandated ongoing LGBT sensitivity training for congregate living providers. Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oswald, Austin, Giunta, Nancy, Johnston, Tim, Wayland, Sherrill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743614/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2340
_version_ 1783624259220799488
author Oswald, Austin
Giunta, Nancy
Johnston, Tim
Wayland, Sherrill
author_facet Oswald, Austin
Giunta, Nancy
Johnston, Tim
Wayland, Sherrill
author_sort Oswald, Austin
collection PubMed
description The majority of aging network service providers are unprepared to deliver targeted services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) older adults. In 2017, California legislature mandated ongoing LGBT sensitivity training for congregate living providers. Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE) developed a specialized training, Creating Inclusive Communities, for congregate living staff to learn the unique needs of LGBT elders. This secondary data analysis compared pre-test knowledge and attitudes of training participants in two states, one mandating LGBT aging sensitivity training (California, N=328) and one without the mandate (New York, N=622). Preliminary results show that prior to receiving training, California participants demonstrate significantly less knowledge of LGBT aging issues compared to New York participants; t(948)=-3.808, p<.001. Attitudinal differences were also demonstrated. These results suggest that laws mandating LGBT sensitivity training may help reach providers with greater training needs. Policy and practice implications will be discussed. Part of a symposium sponsored by Rainbow Research Group Interest Group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7743614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77436142020-12-21 Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California Oswald, Austin Giunta, Nancy Johnston, Tim Wayland, Sherrill Innov Aging Abstracts The majority of aging network service providers are unprepared to deliver targeted services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) older adults. In 2017, California legislature mandated ongoing LGBT sensitivity training for congregate living providers. Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE) developed a specialized training, Creating Inclusive Communities, for congregate living staff to learn the unique needs of LGBT elders. This secondary data analysis compared pre-test knowledge and attitudes of training participants in two states, one mandating LGBT aging sensitivity training (California, N=328) and one without the mandate (New York, N=622). Preliminary results show that prior to receiving training, California participants demonstrate significantly less knowledge of LGBT aging issues compared to New York participants; t(948)=-3.808, p<.001. Attitudinal differences were also demonstrated. These results suggest that laws mandating LGBT sensitivity training may help reach providers with greater training needs. Policy and practice implications will be discussed. Part of a symposium sponsored by Rainbow Research Group Interest Group. Oxford University Press 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743614/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2340 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Oswald, Austin
Giunta, Nancy
Johnston, Tim
Wayland, Sherrill
Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California
title Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California
title_full Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California
title_fullStr Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California
title_short Evaluating the Impact of State Policy Interventions for LGBT Aging: Comparative Case Study of New York and California
title_sort evaluating the impact of state policy interventions for lgbt aging: comparative case study of new york and california
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743614/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2340
work_keys_str_mv AT oswaldaustin evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia
AT giuntanancy evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia
AT johnstontim evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia
AT waylandsherrill evaluatingtheimpactofstatepolicyinterventionsforlgbtagingcomparativecasestudyofnewyorkandcalifornia