Cargando…

Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand

We investigated the conceptual capability of Moistube irrigation (MTI) to discharge under zero applied positive pressure and under varied climatic conditions by inducing an artificial evaporative demand (E(d)) or negative pressure around Moistube tubing. This study was premised on the null hypothesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel, Senzanje, Aidan, Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33326427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236211
_version_ 1783624337439326208
author Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel
Senzanje, Aidan
Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
author_facet Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel
Senzanje, Aidan
Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
author_sort Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel
collection PubMed
description We investigated the conceptual capability of Moistube irrigation (MTI) to discharge under zero applied positive pressure and under varied climatic conditions by inducing an artificial evaporative demand (E(d)) or negative pressure around Moistube tubing. This study was premised on the null hypothesis that an artificially induced E(d) or negative pressure does not impact MTI discharge. Moistube tubing was enclosed in a 1 m long PVC conduit. A 20 l water reservoir placed on an electronic balance provided a continuous supply of water whilst a three-speed hot air blower facilitated the radiative factor and advection process. The procedure was conducted under varied climatic conditions with three air velocity (u(a)) treatments namely; 1.2 m.s(-1), 2.5 m.s(-1), and 3.0 m.s(-1) and the experiment run times were 159 h, 134 h and 10 h, respectively. The average temperature (T(ave)) and relative humidity (RH) data for u(a) = 1.2 m.s(-1) were 53°C and 7.31%, whilst for u(a) = 2.5 m.s(-1), T(ave) was 56°C and RH = 7.19%, and for u(a) = 3.0 m.s(-1), T(ave) was 63°C and RH = 6.16%. The experimental data was input into the four variable Penman-Monteith method to compute the evaporative demand (E(d)). For each E(d), the instantaneous mass flow rate ([Image: see text] ) was recorded using an electronic balance and subsequently converted to volumetric flow rates. For each of the air velocities, the respective E(d) values obtained were 0.16, 0.31 and 0.36 mm.d(-1). The Bowen ratios (r) were well below 1 (r < 1), which suggested a sufficient supply of moisture to evaporate. For E(d) = 0.16 mm.d(-1) the vapour pressure deficit (VPD) was 113.08 mbars, whilst for E(d) = 0.31 mm.d(-1) and for E(d) = 0.36 mm.d(-1) the VPD were 129.93 mbars and 150.14 mbars, respectively. The recorded discharges (q) at normalised time (t*) = 1 h for E(d) = 0.16 mm.d(-1) was 7.67*10(−3) l.hr(-1).m(-1) length, whilst for E(d) = 0.31 mm.d(-1) q = 14.5*10(−3) l.hr(-1).m(-1) length, and for E(d) = 0.36 mm.d(-1) q = 20.8*10(−3) l.hr(-1).m(-1) length. The imposed negative pressure causes an exponential increase in Moistube™ discharge, thus disproving the null hypothesis. The higher the evaporative demand the higher the discharge. This phenomenon allows MTI to be used for deficit irrigation purposes and allows irrigators to capitalize on realistic soil matric potential irrigation scheduling approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7743961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77439612020-12-31 Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel Senzanje, Aidan Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe PLoS One Research Article We investigated the conceptual capability of Moistube irrigation (MTI) to discharge under zero applied positive pressure and under varied climatic conditions by inducing an artificial evaporative demand (E(d)) or negative pressure around Moistube tubing. This study was premised on the null hypothesis that an artificially induced E(d) or negative pressure does not impact MTI discharge. Moistube tubing was enclosed in a 1 m long PVC conduit. A 20 l water reservoir placed on an electronic balance provided a continuous supply of water whilst a three-speed hot air blower facilitated the radiative factor and advection process. The procedure was conducted under varied climatic conditions with three air velocity (u(a)) treatments namely; 1.2 m.s(-1), 2.5 m.s(-1), and 3.0 m.s(-1) and the experiment run times were 159 h, 134 h and 10 h, respectively. The average temperature (T(ave)) and relative humidity (RH) data for u(a) = 1.2 m.s(-1) were 53°C and 7.31%, whilst for u(a) = 2.5 m.s(-1), T(ave) was 56°C and RH = 7.19%, and for u(a) = 3.0 m.s(-1), T(ave) was 63°C and RH = 6.16%. The experimental data was input into the four variable Penman-Monteith method to compute the evaporative demand (E(d)). For each E(d), the instantaneous mass flow rate ([Image: see text] ) was recorded using an electronic balance and subsequently converted to volumetric flow rates. For each of the air velocities, the respective E(d) values obtained were 0.16, 0.31 and 0.36 mm.d(-1). The Bowen ratios (r) were well below 1 (r < 1), which suggested a sufficient supply of moisture to evaporate. For E(d) = 0.16 mm.d(-1) the vapour pressure deficit (VPD) was 113.08 mbars, whilst for E(d) = 0.31 mm.d(-1) and for E(d) = 0.36 mm.d(-1) the VPD were 129.93 mbars and 150.14 mbars, respectively. The recorded discharges (q) at normalised time (t*) = 1 h for E(d) = 0.16 mm.d(-1) was 7.67*10(−3) l.hr(-1).m(-1) length, whilst for E(d) = 0.31 mm.d(-1) q = 14.5*10(−3) l.hr(-1).m(-1) length, and for E(d) = 0.36 mm.d(-1) q = 20.8*10(−3) l.hr(-1).m(-1) length. The imposed negative pressure causes an exponential increase in Moistube™ discharge, thus disproving the null hypothesis. The higher the evaporative demand the higher the discharge. This phenomenon allows MTI to be used for deficit irrigation purposes and allows irrigators to capitalize on realistic soil matric potential irrigation scheduling approach. Public Library of Science 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7743961/ /pubmed/33326427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236211 Text en © 2020 Dirwai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel
Senzanje, Aidan
Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand
title Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand
title_full Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand
title_fullStr Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand
title_full_unstemmed Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand
title_short Moistube irrigation (MTI) discharge under variable evaporative demand
title_sort moistube irrigation (mti) discharge under variable evaporative demand
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33326427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236211
work_keys_str_mv AT dirwaitinashelindel moistubeirrigationmtidischargeundervariableevaporativedemand
AT senzanjeaidan moistubeirrigationmtidischargeundervariableevaporativedemand
AT mabhaudhitafadzwanashe moistubeirrigationmtidischargeundervariableevaporativedemand