Cargando…
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses (SR/MAs) are strongly encouraged to work from a protocol to facilitate high quality, transparent methodology. The completeness of reporting of a protocol (PRISMA-P) and manuscript (PRISMA) is essential to the quality appraisal (AMSTAR-2) a...
Autores principales: | Rainkie, Daniel Christopher, Abedini, Zeinab Salman, Abdelkader, Nada Nabil |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33326429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243091 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Welsh, Emma J, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery—How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review
por: Sathish, Muthu, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
PROTOCOL: The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: a methodological systematic review
por: Wang, Xiaoqin, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review
por: Guo, Liping, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Quality appraisal of gestational diabetes mellitus guidelines with AGREE II: a systematic review
por: Zhang, Mengxing, et al.
Publicado: (2019)