Cargando…

Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birkenbihl, Colin, Salimi, Yasamin, Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel, Lovestone, Simon, Fröhlich, Holger, Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12102
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we evaluate the data landscape by directly investigating nine patient‐level data sets generated in major clinical cohort studies. RESULTS: The investigated cohorts differ in key characteristics, such as demographics and distributions of AD biomarkers. Analyzing the ethnoracial diversity revealed a strong bias toward White/Caucasian individuals. We described and compared the measured data modalities. Finally, the available longitudinal data for important AD biomarkers was evaluated. All results are explorable through our web application ADataViewer (https://adata.scai.fraunhofer.de). DISCUSSION: Our evaluation exposed critical limitations in the AD data landscape that impede comparative approaches across multiple data sets. Comparison of our results to those gained by metadata‐based approaches highlights that thorough investigation of real patient‐level data is imperative to assess a data landscape.