Cargando…

Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birkenbihl, Colin, Salimi, Yasamin, Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel, Lovestone, Simon, Fröhlich, Holger, Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12102
_version_ 1783624350583226368
author Birkenbihl, Colin
Salimi, Yasamin
Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel
Lovestone, Simon
Fröhlich, Holger
Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin
author_facet Birkenbihl, Colin
Salimi, Yasamin
Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel
Lovestone, Simon
Fröhlich, Holger
Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin
author_sort Birkenbihl, Colin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we evaluate the data landscape by directly investigating nine patient‐level data sets generated in major clinical cohort studies. RESULTS: The investigated cohorts differ in key characteristics, such as demographics and distributions of AD biomarkers. Analyzing the ethnoracial diversity revealed a strong bias toward White/Caucasian individuals. We described and compared the measured data modalities. Finally, the available longitudinal data for important AD biomarkers was evaluated. All results are explorable through our web application ADataViewer (https://adata.scai.fraunhofer.de). DISCUSSION: Our evaluation exposed critical limitations in the AD data landscape that impede comparative approaches across multiple data sets. Comparison of our results to those gained by metadata‐based approaches highlights that thorough investigation of real patient‐level data is imperative to assess a data landscape.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7744022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77440222020-12-18 Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape Birkenbihl, Colin Salimi, Yasamin Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel Lovestone, Simon Fröhlich, Holger Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we evaluate the data landscape by directly investigating nine patient‐level data sets generated in major clinical cohort studies. RESULTS: The investigated cohorts differ in key characteristics, such as demographics and distributions of AD biomarkers. Analyzing the ethnoracial diversity revealed a strong bias toward White/Caucasian individuals. We described and compared the measured data modalities. Finally, the available longitudinal data for important AD biomarkers was evaluated. All results are explorable through our web application ADataViewer (https://adata.scai.fraunhofer.de). DISCUSSION: Our evaluation exposed critical limitations in the AD data landscape that impede comparative approaches across multiple data sets. Comparison of our results to those gained by metadata‐based approaches highlights that thorough investigation of real patient‐level data is imperative to assess a data landscape. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7744022/ /pubmed/33344750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12102 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Birkenbihl, Colin
Salimi, Yasamin
Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel
Lovestone, Simon
Fröhlich, Holger
Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin
Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape
title Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape
title_full Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape
title_fullStr Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape
title_short Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape
title_sort evaluating the alzheimer's disease data landscape
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12102
work_keys_str_mv AT birkenbihlcolin evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT salimiyasamin evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT domingofernandezdaniel evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT lovestonesimon evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT frohlichholger evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT hofmannapitiusmartin evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape
AT evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape