Cargando…
Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape
INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12102 |
_version_ | 1783624350583226368 |
---|---|
author | Birkenbihl, Colin Salimi, Yasamin Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel Lovestone, Simon Fröhlich, Holger Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin |
author_facet | Birkenbihl, Colin Salimi, Yasamin Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel Lovestone, Simon Fröhlich, Holger Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin |
author_sort | Birkenbihl, Colin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we evaluate the data landscape by directly investigating nine patient‐level data sets generated in major clinical cohort studies. RESULTS: The investigated cohorts differ in key characteristics, such as demographics and distributions of AD biomarkers. Analyzing the ethnoracial diversity revealed a strong bias toward White/Caucasian individuals. We described and compared the measured data modalities. Finally, the available longitudinal data for important AD biomarkers was evaluated. All results are explorable through our web application ADataViewer (https://adata.scai.fraunhofer.de). DISCUSSION: Our evaluation exposed critical limitations in the AD data landscape that impede comparative approaches across multiple data sets. Comparison of our results to those gained by metadata‐based approaches highlights that thorough investigation of real patient‐level data is imperative to assess a data landscape. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7744022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77440222020-12-18 Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape Birkenbihl, Colin Salimi, Yasamin Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel Lovestone, Simon Fröhlich, Holger Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data‐driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS: Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we evaluate the data landscape by directly investigating nine patient‐level data sets generated in major clinical cohort studies. RESULTS: The investigated cohorts differ in key characteristics, such as demographics and distributions of AD biomarkers. Analyzing the ethnoracial diversity revealed a strong bias toward White/Caucasian individuals. We described and compared the measured data modalities. Finally, the available longitudinal data for important AD biomarkers was evaluated. All results are explorable through our web application ADataViewer (https://adata.scai.fraunhofer.de). DISCUSSION: Our evaluation exposed critical limitations in the AD data landscape that impede comparative approaches across multiple data sets. Comparison of our results to those gained by metadata‐based approaches highlights that thorough investigation of real patient‐level data is imperative to assess a data landscape. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7744022/ /pubmed/33344750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12102 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Birkenbihl, Colin Salimi, Yasamin Domingo‐Fernándéz, Daniel Lovestone, Simon Fröhlich, Holger Hofmann‐Apitius, Martin Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape |
title | Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape |
title_full | Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape |
title_short | Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape |
title_sort | evaluating the alzheimer's disease data landscape |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birkenbihlcolin evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT salimiyasamin evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT domingofernandezdaniel evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT lovestonesimon evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT frohlichholger evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT hofmannapitiusmartin evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape AT evaluatingthealzheimersdiseasedatalandscape |