Cargando…

Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many countries but previous research has suggested that the disease is not detected by CXR in approximately 20% of patients. The risk of lung cancer, with particular symptoms, following a negative CXR is not known. AIM:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, Stephen H, Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding, Aslam, Rehima, Bhartia, Bobby, Callister, Matthew EJ, Kennedy, Martyn PT, Mounce, Luke TA, Shinkins, Bethany, Hamilton, William T, Neal, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33318087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713993
_version_ 1783624355155017728
author Bradley, Stephen H
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
Aslam, Rehima
Bhartia, Bobby
Callister, Matthew EJ
Kennedy, Martyn PT
Mounce, Luke TA
Shinkins, Bethany
Hamilton, William T
Neal, Richard D
author_facet Bradley, Stephen H
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
Aslam, Rehima
Bhartia, Bobby
Callister, Matthew EJ
Kennedy, Martyn PT
Mounce, Luke TA
Shinkins, Bethany
Hamilton, William T
Neal, Richard D
author_sort Bradley, Stephen H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many countries but previous research has suggested that the disease is not detected by CXR in approximately 20% of patients. The risk of lung cancer, with particular symptoms, following a negative CXR is not known. AIM: To establish the sensitivity and specificity of CXR requested by patients who are symptomatic; determine the positive predictive values (PPVs) of each presenting symptom of lung cancer following a negative CXR; and determine whether symptoms associated with lung cancer are different in those who had a positive CXR result compared with those who had a negative CXR result. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study was conducted in Leeds, UK, based on routinely collected data from a service that allowed patients with symptoms of lung cancer to request CXR. METHOD: Symptom data were combined with a diagnostic category (positive or negative) for each CXR, and the sensitivity and specificity of CXR for lung cancer were calculated. The PPV of lung cancer associated with each symptom or combination of symptoms was estimated for those patients with a negative CXR. RESULTS: In total, 114 (1.3%) of 8996 patients who requested a CXR were diagnosed with lung cancer within 1 year. Sensitivity was 75.4% and specificity was 90.2%. The PPV of all symptoms for a diagnosis of lung cancer within 1 year of CXR was <1% for all individual symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 2.9%. PPVs for a diagnosis of lung cancer within 2 years of CXR was <1.5% for all single symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 3.9%. CONCLUSION: CXR has limited sensitivity; however, in a population with a low prevalence of lung cancer, its high specificity and negative predictive value means that lung cancer is very unlikely to be present following a negative result. Findings also support guidance that unexplained haemoptysis warrants urgent referral, regardless of CXR result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7744041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77440412020-12-18 Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study Bradley, Stephen H Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding Aslam, Rehima Bhartia, Bobby Callister, Matthew EJ Kennedy, Martyn PT Mounce, Luke TA Shinkins, Bethany Hamilton, William T Neal, Richard D Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many countries but previous research has suggested that the disease is not detected by CXR in approximately 20% of patients. The risk of lung cancer, with particular symptoms, following a negative CXR is not known. AIM: To establish the sensitivity and specificity of CXR requested by patients who are symptomatic; determine the positive predictive values (PPVs) of each presenting symptom of lung cancer following a negative CXR; and determine whether symptoms associated with lung cancer are different in those who had a positive CXR result compared with those who had a negative CXR result. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study was conducted in Leeds, UK, based on routinely collected data from a service that allowed patients with symptoms of lung cancer to request CXR. METHOD: Symptom data were combined with a diagnostic category (positive or negative) for each CXR, and the sensitivity and specificity of CXR for lung cancer were calculated. The PPV of lung cancer associated with each symptom or combination of symptoms was estimated for those patients with a negative CXR. RESULTS: In total, 114 (1.3%) of 8996 patients who requested a CXR were diagnosed with lung cancer within 1 year. Sensitivity was 75.4% and specificity was 90.2%. The PPV of all symptoms for a diagnosis of lung cancer within 1 year of CXR was <1% for all individual symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 2.9%. PPVs for a diagnosis of lung cancer within 2 years of CXR was <1.5% for all single symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 3.9%. CONCLUSION: CXR has limited sensitivity; however, in a population with a low prevalence of lung cancer, its high specificity and negative predictive value means that lung cancer is very unlikely to be present following a negative result. Findings also support guidance that unexplained haemoptysis warrants urgent referral, regardless of CXR result. Royal College of General Practitioners 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7744041/ /pubmed/33318087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713993 Text en © The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research
Bradley, Stephen H
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
Aslam, Rehima
Bhartia, Bobby
Callister, Matthew EJ
Kennedy, Martyn PT
Mounce, Luke TA
Shinkins, Bethany
Hamilton, William T
Neal, Richard D
Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
title Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
title_full Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
title_short Estimating lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
title_sort estimating lung cancer risk from chest x-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33318087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713993
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleystephenh estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hattonnathaniellukefielding estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT aslamrehima estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT bhartiabobby estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT callistermatthewej estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kennedymartynpt estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT mounceluketa estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shinkinsbethany estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hamiltonwilliamt estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT nealrichardd estimatinglungcancerriskfromchestxrayandsymptomsaprospectivecohortstudy