Cargando…

The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps

This prospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical value of narrow-band imaging (NBI), magnification endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBIME) and magnification endoscopy with acetic acid enhancement and narrow-band imaging (AA-NBIME) in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. We studied 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sha, Jie, Wang, Pin, Sang, Nan, Zhang, Huiai, Yang, Aiping, Chen, Lei, Gong, Zewei, Li, Chao, Qin, Yumeng, Li, Xueliang, Ji, Yong, Gao, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78708-1
_version_ 1783624432682532864
author Sha, Jie
Wang, Pin
Sang, Nan
Zhang, Huiai
Yang, Aiping
Chen, Lei
Gong, Zewei
Li, Chao
Qin, Yumeng
Li, Xueliang
Ji, Yong
Gao, Feng
author_facet Sha, Jie
Wang, Pin
Sang, Nan
Zhang, Huiai
Yang, Aiping
Chen, Lei
Gong, Zewei
Li, Chao
Qin, Yumeng
Li, Xueliang
Ji, Yong
Gao, Feng
author_sort Sha, Jie
collection PubMed
description This prospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical value of narrow-band imaging (NBI), magnification endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBIME) and magnification endoscopy with acetic acid enhancement and narrow-band imaging (AA-NBIME) in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. We studied 261 small colorectal polyps from 122 patients with the use of above three techniques. Lesions were resected for histopathological analysis. The endoscopic images were independently reviewed by three experts and three non-experts and the diagnostic accuracy and image definition were compared among the modalities. The “experts-agreed” diagnostic accuracy was 87.7% for NBI versus 91.6% for NBIME versus 94.6% for AA-NBIME. The “non-experts-agreed” diagnostic accuracy was 80.1% for NBI versus 84.3% for NBIME versus 89.3% for AA-NBIME. All experts and non-experts diagnosed the small colorectal polyps statistically more accurately with AA-NBIME than NBI (P < 0.05). In all three modalities, the expert group’s diagnostic accuracies were statistically significantly higher compared with the non-expert group. For experts, the Kappa values for AA-NBIME, NBIME and NBI diagnosis were 0.962 (0.892–1.032), 0.577 (0.507–0.647) and 0.567 (0.497–0.637), respectively; while for nonexperts, 0.818 (0.748–0.888), 0.532 (0.462–0.602) and 0.530 (0.460–0.600). This demonstrated a good reproducibility of AA-NBIME diagnosis. The average scores (experts and non-experts) of images acquired using AA-NBIME were significantly higher than those acquired using NBIME and ME (P < 0.05). AA-NBIME is a promising tool to clearly visualize the mucosal pit pattern (PP) of colorectal polyps for better differentiating neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7744507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77445072020-12-17 The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps Sha, Jie Wang, Pin Sang, Nan Zhang, Huiai Yang, Aiping Chen, Lei Gong, Zewei Li, Chao Qin, Yumeng Li, Xueliang Ji, Yong Gao, Feng Sci Rep Article This prospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical value of narrow-band imaging (NBI), magnification endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBIME) and magnification endoscopy with acetic acid enhancement and narrow-band imaging (AA-NBIME) in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. We studied 261 small colorectal polyps from 122 patients with the use of above three techniques. Lesions were resected for histopathological analysis. The endoscopic images were independently reviewed by three experts and three non-experts and the diagnostic accuracy and image definition were compared among the modalities. The “experts-agreed” diagnostic accuracy was 87.7% for NBI versus 91.6% for NBIME versus 94.6% for AA-NBIME. The “non-experts-agreed” diagnostic accuracy was 80.1% for NBI versus 84.3% for NBIME versus 89.3% for AA-NBIME. All experts and non-experts diagnosed the small colorectal polyps statistically more accurately with AA-NBIME than NBI (P < 0.05). In all three modalities, the expert group’s diagnostic accuracies were statistically significantly higher compared with the non-expert group. For experts, the Kappa values for AA-NBIME, NBIME and NBI diagnosis were 0.962 (0.892–1.032), 0.577 (0.507–0.647) and 0.567 (0.497–0.637), respectively; while for nonexperts, 0.818 (0.748–0.888), 0.532 (0.462–0.602) and 0.530 (0.460–0.600). This demonstrated a good reproducibility of AA-NBIME diagnosis. The average scores (experts and non-experts) of images acquired using AA-NBIME were significantly higher than those acquired using NBIME and ME (P < 0.05). AA-NBIME is a promising tool to clearly visualize the mucosal pit pattern (PP) of colorectal polyps for better differentiating neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic ones. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7744507/ /pubmed/33328496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78708-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sha, Jie
Wang, Pin
Sang, Nan
Zhang, Huiai
Yang, Aiping
Chen, Lei
Gong, Zewei
Li, Chao
Qin, Yumeng
Li, Xueliang
Ji, Yong
Gao, Feng
The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps
title The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps
title_full The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps
title_fullStr The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps
title_full_unstemmed The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps
title_short The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps
title_sort value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78708-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shajie thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT wangpin thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT sangnan thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT zhanghuiai thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT yangaiping thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT chenlei thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT gongzewei thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT lichao thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT qinyumeng thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT lixueliang thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT jiyong thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT gaofeng thevalueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT shajie valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT wangpin valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT sangnan valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT zhanghuiai valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT yangaiping valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT chenlei valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT gongzewei valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT lichao valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT qinyumeng valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT lixueliang valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT jiyong valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps
AT gaofeng valueofthreenarrowbandimagingmodelinthediagnosisofsmallcolorectalpolyps