Cargando…
Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model
The Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS, 7 items) measures patient-rated group cohesiveness. The English version of the scale has demonstrated good psychometric properties. This study describes the validation of the Czech version of the GCS. A total of 369 patients participated in the study. Unlike the or...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595651 |
_version_ | 1783624472132059136 |
---|---|
author | Klocek, Adam Řiháček, Tomáš Cígler, Hynek |
author_facet | Klocek, Adam Řiháček, Tomáš Cígler, Hynek |
author_sort | Klocek, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS, 7 items) measures patient-rated group cohesiveness. The English version of the scale has demonstrated good psychometric properties. This study describes the validation of the Czech version of the GCS. A total of 369 patients participated in the study. Unlike the original study, the ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a two-dimensional solution (RMSEA = 0.075; TLI = 0.986). The analysis demonstrated the existence of two moderately to highly associated (r = 0.79) domains of group cohesiveness—affective and behavioral. The two-dimensional model was invariant across genders, age, education, and time (retest after 6 weeks) up to factor means level. Internal consistency reached satisfactory values for both domains (affective, ω = 0.86; behavioral, ω = 0.81). In terms of convergent validity, only weak association was found between the GCS domains and the group working alliance measured by the Group Outcome Rating Scale (GSRS). This is the first revision of the factor structure of the GCS in the European context. The scale showed that the Czech version of the GCS is a valid and reliable brief tool for measuring both aspects of group cohesiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7744677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77446772020-12-18 Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model Klocek, Adam Řiháček, Tomáš Cígler, Hynek Front Psychol Psychology The Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS, 7 items) measures patient-rated group cohesiveness. The English version of the scale has demonstrated good psychometric properties. This study describes the validation of the Czech version of the GCS. A total of 369 patients participated in the study. Unlike the original study, the ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a two-dimensional solution (RMSEA = 0.075; TLI = 0.986). The analysis demonstrated the existence of two moderately to highly associated (r = 0.79) domains of group cohesiveness—affective and behavioral. The two-dimensional model was invariant across genders, age, education, and time (retest after 6 weeks) up to factor means level. Internal consistency reached satisfactory values for both domains (affective, ω = 0.86; behavioral, ω = 0.81). In terms of convergent validity, only weak association was found between the GCS domains and the group working alliance measured by the Group Outcome Rating Scale (GSRS). This is the first revision of the factor structure of the GCS in the European context. The scale showed that the Czech version of the GCS is a valid and reliable brief tool for measuring both aspects of group cohesiveness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7744677/ /pubmed/33343465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595651 Text en Copyright © 2020 Klocek, Řiháček and Cígler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Klocek, Adam Řiháček, Tomáš Cígler, Hynek Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model |
title | Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model |
title_full | Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model |
title_fullStr | Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model |
title_short | Psychometric Evaluation of the Czech Version of Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS) in a Clinical Sample: A Two-Dimensional Model |
title_sort | psychometric evaluation of the czech version of group cohesiveness scale (gcs) in a clinical sample: a two-dimensional model |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klocekadam psychometricevaluationoftheczechversionofgroupcohesivenessscalegcsinaclinicalsampleatwodimensionalmodel AT rihacektomas psychometricevaluationoftheczechversionofgroupcohesivenessscalegcsinaclinicalsampleatwodimensionalmodel AT ciglerhynek psychometricevaluationoftheczechversionofgroupcohesivenessscalegcsinaclinicalsampleatwodimensionalmodel |