Cargando…
Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature
Introduction: In recent years, a growing body of literature has investigated the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques as a putative treatment in Huntington's Disease (HD). Our aim was to evaluate the effects of cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Simulation (ctDCS) on the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.614717 |
_version_ | 1783624483064512512 |
---|---|
author | Bocci, Tommaso Baloscio, Davide Ferrucci, Roberta Sartucci, Ferdinando Priori, Alberto |
author_facet | Bocci, Tommaso Baloscio, Davide Ferrucci, Roberta Sartucci, Ferdinando Priori, Alberto |
author_sort | Bocci, Tommaso |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: In recent years, a growing body of literature has investigated the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques as a putative treatment in Huntington's Disease (HD). Our aim was to evaluate the effects of cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Simulation (ctDCS) on the motor outcome in patients affected by HD, encompassing at the same time the current knowledge about the effects of NIBS both on motor and non-motor dysfunctions in HD. Materials and Methods: Four patients (two females) were enrolled and underwent ctDCS (both anodal or sham, elapsed by at least 3 months: 2.0 mA, 20 min per day, 5 days a week). Clinical scores were assessed by using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale – part I (UHDRS-I), immediately before ctDCS (T(0)), at the end of the 5-days treatment (T(1)) and 4 weeks later (T(2)). Results: Anodal ctDCS improved motor scores compared to baseline (p = 0.0046), whereas sham stimulation left them unchanged (p = 0.33, Friedman test). In particular, following anodal ctDCS, UHDRS-I score significantly improved, especially regarding the subitem “dystonia,” both at T(1) and T(2) compared to sham condition (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed test). Conclusions: ctDCS improved motor scores in HD, with effects lasting for about 4 weeks after tDCS completion. This is the first study discussing the putative role of cerebellar non-invasive simulation for the treatment of HD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7744723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77447232020-12-18 Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature Bocci, Tommaso Baloscio, Davide Ferrucci, Roberta Sartucci, Ferdinando Priori, Alberto Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: In recent years, a growing body of literature has investigated the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques as a putative treatment in Huntington's Disease (HD). Our aim was to evaluate the effects of cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Simulation (ctDCS) on the motor outcome in patients affected by HD, encompassing at the same time the current knowledge about the effects of NIBS both on motor and non-motor dysfunctions in HD. Materials and Methods: Four patients (two females) were enrolled and underwent ctDCS (both anodal or sham, elapsed by at least 3 months: 2.0 mA, 20 min per day, 5 days a week). Clinical scores were assessed by using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale – part I (UHDRS-I), immediately before ctDCS (T(0)), at the end of the 5-days treatment (T(1)) and 4 weeks later (T(2)). Results: Anodal ctDCS improved motor scores compared to baseline (p = 0.0046), whereas sham stimulation left them unchanged (p = 0.33, Friedman test). In particular, following anodal ctDCS, UHDRS-I score significantly improved, especially regarding the subitem “dystonia,” both at T(1) and T(2) compared to sham condition (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed test). Conclusions: ctDCS improved motor scores in HD, with effects lasting for about 4 weeks after tDCS completion. This is the first study discussing the putative role of cerebellar non-invasive simulation for the treatment of HD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7744723/ /pubmed/33343504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.614717 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bocci, Baloscio, Ferrucci, Sartucci and Priori. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Bocci, Tommaso Baloscio, Davide Ferrucci, Roberta Sartucci, Ferdinando Priori, Alberto Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature |
title | Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature |
title_full | Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature |
title_short | Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature |
title_sort | cerebellar direct current stimulation (ctdcs) in the treatment of huntington's disease: a pilot study and a short review of the literature |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.614717 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boccitommaso cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature AT balosciodavide cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature AT ferrucciroberta cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature AT sartucciferdinando cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature AT priorialberto cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature |