Cargando…

Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature

Introduction: In recent years, a growing body of literature has investigated the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques as a putative treatment in Huntington's Disease (HD). Our aim was to evaluate the effects of cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Simulation (ctDCS) on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bocci, Tommaso, Baloscio, Davide, Ferrucci, Roberta, Sartucci, Ferdinando, Priori, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.614717
_version_ 1783624483064512512
author Bocci, Tommaso
Baloscio, Davide
Ferrucci, Roberta
Sartucci, Ferdinando
Priori, Alberto
author_facet Bocci, Tommaso
Baloscio, Davide
Ferrucci, Roberta
Sartucci, Ferdinando
Priori, Alberto
author_sort Bocci, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Introduction: In recent years, a growing body of literature has investigated the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques as a putative treatment in Huntington's Disease (HD). Our aim was to evaluate the effects of cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Simulation (ctDCS) on the motor outcome in patients affected by HD, encompassing at the same time the current knowledge about the effects of NIBS both on motor and non-motor dysfunctions in HD. Materials and Methods: Four patients (two females) were enrolled and underwent ctDCS (both anodal or sham, elapsed by at least 3 months: 2.0 mA, 20 min per day, 5 days a week). Clinical scores were assessed by using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale – part I (UHDRS-I), immediately before ctDCS (T(0)), at the end of the 5-days treatment (T(1)) and 4 weeks later (T(2)). Results: Anodal ctDCS improved motor scores compared to baseline (p = 0.0046), whereas sham stimulation left them unchanged (p = 0.33, Friedman test). In particular, following anodal ctDCS, UHDRS-I score significantly improved, especially regarding the subitem “dystonia,” both at T(1) and T(2) compared to sham condition (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed test). Conclusions: ctDCS improved motor scores in HD, with effects lasting for about 4 weeks after tDCS completion. This is the first study discussing the putative role of cerebellar non-invasive simulation for the treatment of HD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7744723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77447232020-12-18 Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature Bocci, Tommaso Baloscio, Davide Ferrucci, Roberta Sartucci, Ferdinando Priori, Alberto Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: In recent years, a growing body of literature has investigated the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques as a putative treatment in Huntington's Disease (HD). Our aim was to evaluate the effects of cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Simulation (ctDCS) on the motor outcome in patients affected by HD, encompassing at the same time the current knowledge about the effects of NIBS both on motor and non-motor dysfunctions in HD. Materials and Methods: Four patients (two females) were enrolled and underwent ctDCS (both anodal or sham, elapsed by at least 3 months: 2.0 mA, 20 min per day, 5 days a week). Clinical scores were assessed by using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale – part I (UHDRS-I), immediately before ctDCS (T(0)), at the end of the 5-days treatment (T(1)) and 4 weeks later (T(2)). Results: Anodal ctDCS improved motor scores compared to baseline (p = 0.0046), whereas sham stimulation left them unchanged (p = 0.33, Friedman test). In particular, following anodal ctDCS, UHDRS-I score significantly improved, especially regarding the subitem “dystonia,” both at T(1) and T(2) compared to sham condition (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed test). Conclusions: ctDCS improved motor scores in HD, with effects lasting for about 4 weeks after tDCS completion. This is the first study discussing the putative role of cerebellar non-invasive simulation for the treatment of HD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7744723/ /pubmed/33343504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.614717 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bocci, Baloscio, Ferrucci, Sartucci and Priori. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Bocci, Tommaso
Baloscio, Davide
Ferrucci, Roberta
Sartucci, Ferdinando
Priori, Alberto
Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature
title Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature
title_full Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature
title_short Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) in the Treatment of Huntington's Disease: A Pilot Study and a Short Review of the Literature
title_sort cerebellar direct current stimulation (ctdcs) in the treatment of huntington's disease: a pilot study and a short review of the literature
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.614717
work_keys_str_mv AT boccitommaso cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature
AT balosciodavide cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature
AT ferrucciroberta cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature
AT sartucciferdinando cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature
AT priorialberto cerebellardirectcurrentstimulationctdcsinthetreatmentofhuntingtonsdiseaseapilotstudyandashortreviewoftheliterature