Cargando…

Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis

PURPOSE: This study investigated whether hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) increased breast-related complication(s) compared to conventional fractionated RT in reconstructed breast cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review including 349 breast cancer patients who underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong-Yun, Park, Eonju, Heo, Chan Yeong, Jin, Ung Sik, Kim, Eun Kyu, Han, Wonshik, Shin, Kyung Hwan, Kim, In Ah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.020
_version_ 1783624492795297792
author Kim, Dong-Yun
Park, Eonju
Heo, Chan Yeong
Jin, Ung Sik
Kim, Eun Kyu
Han, Wonshik
Shin, Kyung Hwan
Kim, In Ah
author_facet Kim, Dong-Yun
Park, Eonju
Heo, Chan Yeong
Jin, Ung Sik
Kim, Eun Kyu
Han, Wonshik
Shin, Kyung Hwan
Kim, In Ah
author_sort Kim, Dong-Yun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study investigated whether hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) increased breast-related complication(s) compared to conventional fractionated RT in reconstructed breast cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review including 349 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) between 2009 and 2018 at two institutions. All patients were treated with adjuvant RT via either a conventional fractionated or hypofractionated regimen. We defined a major breast complication as a breast-related toxic event requiring re-operation or re-hospitalization during the follow-up period after the end of RT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 32.3 months (4.8–118.5 months); 126 patients had conventional fractionated RT, and 223 patients received hypofractionated RT. In patients with mastectomy, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of any or major breast-related complications between the two fractionation regimens. In patients undergoing BCS, incidence of any breast complication showed no difference between two RT groups and no major breast complication was reported as well. Hypofractionated RT did not increase major wound problem (infection and dehiscence) compared to conventional RT. Incidence of major contracture was significantly lower in hypofractionated RT. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of any or major breast-related complications between the two different fractionation regimens, even in patients with mastectomy. Hypofractionated RT may be used comparable to conventional fractionated RT in terms of breast-related complications in reconstructed breast cancer patients. The prospective randomized trial would be necessary to clarify this issue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7744765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77447652020-12-21 Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis Kim, Dong-Yun Park, Eonju Heo, Chan Yeong Jin, Ung Sik Kim, Eun Kyu Han, Wonshik Shin, Kyung Hwan Kim, In Ah Breast Original Article PURPOSE: This study investigated whether hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) increased breast-related complication(s) compared to conventional fractionated RT in reconstructed breast cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review including 349 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) between 2009 and 2018 at two institutions. All patients were treated with adjuvant RT via either a conventional fractionated or hypofractionated regimen. We defined a major breast complication as a breast-related toxic event requiring re-operation or re-hospitalization during the follow-up period after the end of RT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 32.3 months (4.8–118.5 months); 126 patients had conventional fractionated RT, and 223 patients received hypofractionated RT. In patients with mastectomy, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of any or major breast-related complications between the two fractionation regimens. In patients undergoing BCS, incidence of any breast complication showed no difference between two RT groups and no major breast complication was reported as well. Hypofractionated RT did not increase major wound problem (infection and dehiscence) compared to conventional RT. Incidence of major contracture was significantly lower in hypofractionated RT. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of any or major breast-related complications between the two different fractionation regimens, even in patients with mastectomy. Hypofractionated RT may be used comparable to conventional fractionated RT in terms of breast-related complications in reconstructed breast cancer patients. The prospective randomized trial would be necessary to clarify this issue. Elsevier 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7744765/ /pubmed/33316582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.020 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Dong-Yun
Park, Eonju
Heo, Chan Yeong
Jin, Ung Sik
Kim, Eun Kyu
Han, Wonshik
Shin, Kyung Hwan
Kim, In Ah
Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis
title Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis
title_full Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis
title_fullStr Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis
title_short Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis
title_sort hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: toxicity analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.020
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdongyun hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis
AT parkeonju hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis
AT heochanyeong hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis
AT jinungsik hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis
AT kimeunkyu hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis
AT hanwonshik hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis
AT shinkyunghwan hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis
AT kiminah hypofractionatedversusconventionalfractionatedradiotherapyforbreastcancerinpatientswithreconstructedbreasttoxicityanalysis