Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of telomerase activity (TA) for bladder cancer (BC) by meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 1, 2019. We used Stata 15 and Review Manager 5.3 for cal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Lei, Li, Jinze, Meng, Chunyang, Li, Jinming, Tang, Dandan, Guan, Fangxue, Xu, Peng, Wei, Tangqiang, Li, Yunxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344230
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.570127
_version_ 1783624515953098752
author Peng, Lei
Li, Jinze
Meng, Chunyang
Li, Jinming
Tang, Dandan
Guan, Fangxue
Xu, Peng
Wei, Tangqiang
Li, Yunxiang
author_facet Peng, Lei
Li, Jinze
Meng, Chunyang
Li, Jinming
Tang, Dandan
Guan, Fangxue
Xu, Peng
Wei, Tangqiang
Li, Yunxiang
author_sort Peng, Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of telomerase activity (TA) for bladder cancer (BC) by meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 1, 2019. We used Stata 15 and Review Manager 5.3 for calculations and statistical analysis. RESULTS: To evaluate the diagnostic value of TA for BC, we performed a meta-analysis on 22 studies, with a total of 2,867 individuals, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled parameters were calculated from all studies, and we found a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84), a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.94), a PLR of 8.91 (95% CI: 5.91–13.43), an NLR of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.15–0.37), a DOR of 37.90 (95% CI: 23.32–61.59), and an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94). We also conducted a subgroup analysis based on the different stages and grades of BC. Results from the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in TA in either high and low stages of BC, but that low-grade tumors had a lower TA than high-grade tumours. CONCLUSIONS: TA can be used as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer with its high specificity. Rigorous and high-quality prospective studies are required to verify our conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7744937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77449372020-12-18 Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Peng, Lei Li, Jinze Meng, Chunyang Li, Jinming Tang, Dandan Guan, Fangxue Xu, Peng Wei, Tangqiang Li, Yunxiang Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of telomerase activity (TA) for bladder cancer (BC) by meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 1, 2019. We used Stata 15 and Review Manager 5.3 for calculations and statistical analysis. RESULTS: To evaluate the diagnostic value of TA for BC, we performed a meta-analysis on 22 studies, with a total of 2,867 individuals, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled parameters were calculated from all studies, and we found a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84), a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.94), a PLR of 8.91 (95% CI: 5.91–13.43), an NLR of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.15–0.37), a DOR of 37.90 (95% CI: 23.32–61.59), and an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94). We also conducted a subgroup analysis based on the different stages and grades of BC. Results from the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in TA in either high and low stages of BC, but that low-grade tumors had a lower TA than high-grade tumours. CONCLUSIONS: TA can be used as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer with its high specificity. Rigorous and high-quality prospective studies are required to verify our conclusion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7744937/ /pubmed/33344230 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.570127 Text en Copyright © 2020 Peng, Li, Meng, Li, Tang, Guan, Xu, Wei and Li http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Peng, Lei
Li, Jinze
Meng, Chunyang
Li, Jinming
Tang, Dandan
Guan, Fangxue
Xu, Peng
Wei, Tangqiang
Li, Yunxiang
Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_full Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_short Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test
title_sort diagnostic value of telomerase activity in patients with bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344230
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.570127
work_keys_str_mv AT penglei diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT lijinze diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT mengchunyang diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT lijinming diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT tangdandan diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT guanfangxue diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT xupeng diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT weitangqiang diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest
AT liyunxiang diagnosticvalueoftelomeraseactivityinpatientswithbladdercancerametaanalysisofdiagnostictest