Cargando…
Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
To investigate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted quantification on initial chest CT for prediction of disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and initially of non-severe type were retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79097-1 |
_version_ | 1783624531045253120 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yuehua Shang, Kai Bian, Wei He, Li Fan, Ying Ren, Tao Zhang, Jiayin |
author_facet | Li, Yuehua Shang, Kai Bian, Wei He, Li Fan, Ying Ren, Tao Zhang, Jiayin |
author_sort | Li, Yuehua |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted quantification on initial chest CT for prediction of disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and initially of non-severe type were retrospectively included. The initial CT scan on admission was used for imaging analysis. The presence of ground glass opacity (GGO), consolidation and other findings were visually evaluated. CT severity score was calculated according to the extent of lesion involvement. In addition, AI based quantification of GGO and consolidation volume were also performed. 123 patients (mean age: 64.43 ± 14.02; 62 males) were included. GGO + consolidation was more frequently revealed in progress-to-severe group whereas pure GGO was more likely to be found in non-severe group. Compared to non-severe group, patients in progress-to-severe group had larger GGO volume (167.33 ± 167.88 cm(3) versus 101.12 ± 127 cm(3), p = 0.013) as well as consolidation volume (40.85 ± 60.4 cm(3) versus 6.63 ± 14.91 cm(3), p < 0.001). Among imaging parameters, consolidation volume had the largest area under curve (AUC) in discriminating non-severe from progress-to-severe group (AUC = 0.796, p < 0.001) and patients with or without critical events (AUC = 0.754, p < 0.001). According to multivariate regression, consolidation volume and age were two strongest predictors for disease progression (hazard ratio: 1.053 and 1.071, p: 0.006 and 0.008) whereas age and diabetes were predictors for unfavorable outcome. Consolidation volume quantified on initial chest CT was the strongest predictor for disease severity progression and larger consolidation volume was associated with unfavorable clinical outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7745019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77450192020-12-18 Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification Li, Yuehua Shang, Kai Bian, Wei He, Li Fan, Ying Ren, Tao Zhang, Jiayin Sci Rep Article To investigate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted quantification on initial chest CT for prediction of disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and initially of non-severe type were retrospectively included. The initial CT scan on admission was used for imaging analysis. The presence of ground glass opacity (GGO), consolidation and other findings were visually evaluated. CT severity score was calculated according to the extent of lesion involvement. In addition, AI based quantification of GGO and consolidation volume were also performed. 123 patients (mean age: 64.43 ± 14.02; 62 males) were included. GGO + consolidation was more frequently revealed in progress-to-severe group whereas pure GGO was more likely to be found in non-severe group. Compared to non-severe group, patients in progress-to-severe group had larger GGO volume (167.33 ± 167.88 cm(3) versus 101.12 ± 127 cm(3), p = 0.013) as well as consolidation volume (40.85 ± 60.4 cm(3) versus 6.63 ± 14.91 cm(3), p < 0.001). Among imaging parameters, consolidation volume had the largest area under curve (AUC) in discriminating non-severe from progress-to-severe group (AUC = 0.796, p < 0.001) and patients with or without critical events (AUC = 0.754, p < 0.001). According to multivariate regression, consolidation volume and age were two strongest predictors for disease progression (hazard ratio: 1.053 and 1.071, p: 0.006 and 0.008) whereas age and diabetes were predictors for unfavorable outcome. Consolidation volume quantified on initial chest CT was the strongest predictor for disease severity progression and larger consolidation volume was associated with unfavorable clinical outcome. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7745019/ /pubmed/33328512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79097-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Yuehua Shang, Kai Bian, Wei He, Li Fan, Ying Ren, Tao Zhang, Jiayin Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification |
title | Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification |
title_full | Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification |
title_fullStr | Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification |
title_short | Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification |
title_sort | prediction of disease progression in patients with covid-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79097-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyuehua predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification AT shangkai predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification AT bianwei predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification AT heli predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification AT fanying predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification AT rentao predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification AT zhangjiayin predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification |