Cargando…

Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification

To investigate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted quantification on initial chest CT for prediction of disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and initially of non-severe type were retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yuehua, Shang, Kai, Bian, Wei, He, Li, Fan, Ying, Ren, Tao, Zhang, Jiayin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79097-1
_version_ 1783624531045253120
author Li, Yuehua
Shang, Kai
Bian, Wei
He, Li
Fan, Ying
Ren, Tao
Zhang, Jiayin
author_facet Li, Yuehua
Shang, Kai
Bian, Wei
He, Li
Fan, Ying
Ren, Tao
Zhang, Jiayin
author_sort Li, Yuehua
collection PubMed
description To investigate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted quantification on initial chest CT for prediction of disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and initially of non-severe type were retrospectively included. The initial CT scan on admission was used for imaging analysis. The presence of ground glass opacity (GGO), consolidation and other findings were visually evaluated. CT severity score was calculated according to the extent of lesion involvement. In addition, AI based quantification of GGO and consolidation volume were also performed. 123 patients (mean age: 64.43 ± 14.02; 62 males) were included. GGO + consolidation was more frequently revealed in progress-to-severe group whereas pure GGO was more likely to be found in non-severe group. Compared to non-severe group, patients in progress-to-severe group had larger GGO volume (167.33 ± 167.88 cm(3) versus 101.12 ± 127 cm(3), p = 0.013) as well as consolidation volume (40.85 ± 60.4 cm(3) versus 6.63 ± 14.91 cm(3), p < 0.001). Among imaging parameters, consolidation volume had the largest area under curve (AUC) in discriminating non-severe from progress-to-severe group (AUC = 0.796, p < 0.001) and patients with or without critical events (AUC = 0.754, p < 0.001). According to multivariate regression, consolidation volume and age were two strongest predictors for disease progression (hazard ratio: 1.053 and 1.071, p: 0.006 and 0.008) whereas age and diabetes were predictors for unfavorable outcome. Consolidation volume quantified on initial chest CT was the strongest predictor for disease severity progression and larger consolidation volume was associated with unfavorable clinical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7745019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77450192020-12-18 Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification Li, Yuehua Shang, Kai Bian, Wei He, Li Fan, Ying Ren, Tao Zhang, Jiayin Sci Rep Article To investigate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted quantification on initial chest CT for prediction of disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and initially of non-severe type were retrospectively included. The initial CT scan on admission was used for imaging analysis. The presence of ground glass opacity (GGO), consolidation and other findings were visually evaluated. CT severity score was calculated according to the extent of lesion involvement. In addition, AI based quantification of GGO and consolidation volume were also performed. 123 patients (mean age: 64.43 ± 14.02; 62 males) were included. GGO + consolidation was more frequently revealed in progress-to-severe group whereas pure GGO was more likely to be found in non-severe group. Compared to non-severe group, patients in progress-to-severe group had larger GGO volume (167.33 ± 167.88 cm(3) versus 101.12 ± 127 cm(3), p = 0.013) as well as consolidation volume (40.85 ± 60.4 cm(3) versus 6.63 ± 14.91 cm(3), p < 0.001). Among imaging parameters, consolidation volume had the largest area under curve (AUC) in discriminating non-severe from progress-to-severe group (AUC = 0.796, p < 0.001) and patients with or without critical events (AUC = 0.754, p < 0.001). According to multivariate regression, consolidation volume and age were two strongest predictors for disease progression (hazard ratio: 1.053 and 1.071, p: 0.006 and 0.008) whereas age and diabetes were predictors for unfavorable outcome. Consolidation volume quantified on initial chest CT was the strongest predictor for disease severity progression and larger consolidation volume was associated with unfavorable clinical outcome. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7745019/ /pubmed/33328512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79097-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Li, Yuehua
Shang, Kai
Bian, Wei
He, Li
Fan, Ying
Ren, Tao
Zhang, Jiayin
Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
title Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
title_full Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
title_fullStr Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
title_short Prediction of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
title_sort prediction of disease progression in patients with covid-19 by artificial intelligence assisted lesion quantification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79097-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuehua predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification
AT shangkai predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification
AT bianwei predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification
AT heli predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification
AT fanying predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification
AT rentao predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification
AT zhangjiayin predictionofdiseaseprogressioninpatientswithcovid19byartificialintelligenceassistedlesionquantification