Cargando…

Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity

This cross-sectional investigation studied differences in insulin resistance across levels of physical activity in 6,500 US adults who were randomly selected as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Another important objective was to determine the influence of abdomi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fowler, James R., Tucker, Larry A., Bailey, Bruce W., LeCheminant, James D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3848256
_version_ 1783624538143064064
author Fowler, James R.
Tucker, Larry A.
Bailey, Bruce W.
LeCheminant, James D.
author_facet Fowler, James R.
Tucker, Larry A.
Bailey, Bruce W.
LeCheminant, James D.
author_sort Fowler, James R.
collection PubMed
description This cross-sectional investigation studied differences in insulin resistance across levels of physical activity in 6,500 US adults who were randomly selected as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Another important objective was to determine the influence of abdominal obesity on the physical activity and insulin resistance relationship. MET-minutes were utilized to quantify total activity based on participation in 48 different physical activities. Two strategies were employed to categorize levels of physical activity: one was based on relative MET-minutes (quartiles), and the other approach was based on the US physical activity guidelines. Insulin resistance was indexed using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA). Abdominal obesity was indexed using waist circumference. Effect modification was tested by dividing waist circumferences into sex-specific quartiles and then evaluating the relationship between physical activity and HOMA-IR within each quartile separately. Results showed that relative physical activity level was associated with HOMA-IR after controlling for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates (F = 11.5, P < 0.0001 and F = 6.0, P=0.0012, respectively). Adjusting for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates also resulted in significant relationships between guideline-based activity and HOMA-IR (F = 8.0, P < 0.0001 and F = 4.9, P=0.0017, respectively). However, statistically controlling for differences in waist circumference with the other covariates nullified the relationship between total physical activity and HOMA-IR. Effect modification testing showed that when the sample was delimited to adults with abdominal obesity (Quartile 4), relative (F = 5.6, P=0.0019) and guideline-based physical activity (F = 3.7, P=0.0098) and HOMA-IR were significantly associated. Physical activity and HOMA-IR were not related within the other three quartiles. In conclusion, it appears that differences in physical activity may play a meaningful role in insulin resistance in those with abdominal obesity, but total activity does not seem to account for differences in insulin resistance among US adults with smaller waists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7745049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77450492020-12-28 Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity Fowler, James R. Tucker, Larry A. Bailey, Bruce W. LeCheminant, James D. J Obes Research Article This cross-sectional investigation studied differences in insulin resistance across levels of physical activity in 6,500 US adults who were randomly selected as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Another important objective was to determine the influence of abdominal obesity on the physical activity and insulin resistance relationship. MET-minutes were utilized to quantify total activity based on participation in 48 different physical activities. Two strategies were employed to categorize levels of physical activity: one was based on relative MET-minutes (quartiles), and the other approach was based on the US physical activity guidelines. Insulin resistance was indexed using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA). Abdominal obesity was indexed using waist circumference. Effect modification was tested by dividing waist circumferences into sex-specific quartiles and then evaluating the relationship between physical activity and HOMA-IR within each quartile separately. Results showed that relative physical activity level was associated with HOMA-IR after controlling for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates (F = 11.5, P < 0.0001 and F = 6.0, P=0.0012, respectively). Adjusting for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates also resulted in significant relationships between guideline-based activity and HOMA-IR (F = 8.0, P < 0.0001 and F = 4.9, P=0.0017, respectively). However, statistically controlling for differences in waist circumference with the other covariates nullified the relationship between total physical activity and HOMA-IR. Effect modification testing showed that when the sample was delimited to adults with abdominal obesity (Quartile 4), relative (F = 5.6, P=0.0019) and guideline-based physical activity (F = 3.7, P=0.0098) and HOMA-IR were significantly associated. Physical activity and HOMA-IR were not related within the other three quartiles. In conclusion, it appears that differences in physical activity may play a meaningful role in insulin resistance in those with abdominal obesity, but total activity does not seem to account for differences in insulin resistance among US adults with smaller waists. Hindawi 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7745049/ /pubmed/33376604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3848256 Text en Copyright © 2020 James R. Fowler et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fowler, James R.
Tucker, Larry A.
Bailey, Bruce W.
LeCheminant, James D.
Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_full Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_fullStr Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_full_unstemmed Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_short Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_sort physical activity and insulin resistance in 6,500 nhanes adults: the role of abdominal obesity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3848256
work_keys_str_mv AT fowlerjamesr physicalactivityandinsulinresistancein6500nhanesadultstheroleofabdominalobesity
AT tuckerlarrya physicalactivityandinsulinresistancein6500nhanesadultstheroleofabdominalobesity
AT baileybrucew physicalactivityandinsulinresistancein6500nhanesadultstheroleofabdominalobesity
AT lecheminantjamesd physicalactivityandinsulinresistancein6500nhanesadultstheroleofabdominalobesity