Cargando…
Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study
BACKGROUND: The increasing use of preprints to disseminate evidence on the effect of interventions for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to multiple evidence sources for a single study, which may differ in the reported evidence. We aim to describe the proportion of evidence on the eff...
Autores principales: | Oikonomidi, Theodora, Boutron, Isabelle, Pierre, Olivier, Cabanac, Guillaume, Ravaud, Philippe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33334338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01880-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links
por: Cabanac, Guillaume, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention
por: Lazarus, Clément, et al.
Publicado: (2015)