Cargando…
Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants
BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) display impaired executive functions compared with healthy controls (HCs). Furthermore, unaffected first-degree relatives (FRs) of patients with SCZ independently perform worse executive functions than do HCs. However, few studies have investigated the d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32692837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaa052 |
_version_ | 1783624575763873792 |
---|---|
author | Kataoka, Yuzuru Shimada, Takamitsu Koide, Yoko Okubo, Hiroaki Uehara, Takashi Shioiri, Toshiki Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Ohi, Kazutaka |
author_facet | Kataoka, Yuzuru Shimada, Takamitsu Koide, Yoko Okubo, Hiroaki Uehara, Takashi Shioiri, Toshiki Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Ohi, Kazutaka |
author_sort | Kataoka, Yuzuru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) display impaired executive functions compared with healthy controls (HCs). Furthermore, unaffected first-degree relatives (FRs) of patients with SCZ independently perform worse executive functions than do HCs. However, few studies have investigated the differences in executive functions assessed among patients with SCZ, FRs, and HCs, and the findings are inconsistent. METHODS: We investigated diagnostic differences in executive functions, namely (1) numbers of categories achieved (CA), (2) total errors (TE), and (3) percentage of perseverative errors of Nelson types (%PEN), using the Wisconsin card sorting test among patients with SCZ (n = 116), unaffected FRs (n = 62), and HCs (n = 146) at a single institute. Correlations between these executive functions and clinical variables were investigated. RESULTS: Significant differences existed in all executive functions among diagnostic groups (CA, F(2,319) = 15.5, P = 3.71 × 10(–7); TE, F(2,319) = 16.2, P = 2.06 × 10(–7); and %PEN, F(2,319) = 21.3, P = 2.15 × 10(–9)). Patients with SCZ had fewer CA and more TE and %PEN than those of HCs (CA, Cohen’s d = −0.70, P = 5.49 × 10(–8); TE, d = 0.70, P = 5.62 × 10(–8); and %PEN, d = 0.82, P = 2.85 × 10(−10)) and FRs (TE, d = 0.46, P = 3.73 × 10(–3) and %PEN, d = 0.38, P = .017). Of the 3 executive functions, CA and %PEN of FRs were intermediately impaired between patients with SCZ and HCs (CA, d = −0.41, P = .011 and %PEN, d = 0.41, P = .012). In contrast, no significant difference in TE existed between FRs and HCs (d = 0.22, P = .18). Although CA and TE were affected by the duration of illness (P < .017), %PEN was not affected by any clinical variable in patients with SCZ (P > .017). CONCLUSIONS: Executive function, particularly %PEN, could be a useful intermediate phenotype for understanding the genetic mechanisms implicated in SCZ pathophysiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7745249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77452492020-12-22 Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants Kataoka, Yuzuru Shimada, Takamitsu Koide, Yoko Okubo, Hiroaki Uehara, Takashi Shioiri, Toshiki Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Ohi, Kazutaka Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Regular Research Articles BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) display impaired executive functions compared with healthy controls (HCs). Furthermore, unaffected first-degree relatives (FRs) of patients with SCZ independently perform worse executive functions than do HCs. However, few studies have investigated the differences in executive functions assessed among patients with SCZ, FRs, and HCs, and the findings are inconsistent. METHODS: We investigated diagnostic differences in executive functions, namely (1) numbers of categories achieved (CA), (2) total errors (TE), and (3) percentage of perseverative errors of Nelson types (%PEN), using the Wisconsin card sorting test among patients with SCZ (n = 116), unaffected FRs (n = 62), and HCs (n = 146) at a single institute. Correlations between these executive functions and clinical variables were investigated. RESULTS: Significant differences existed in all executive functions among diagnostic groups (CA, F(2,319) = 15.5, P = 3.71 × 10(–7); TE, F(2,319) = 16.2, P = 2.06 × 10(–7); and %PEN, F(2,319) = 21.3, P = 2.15 × 10(–9)). Patients with SCZ had fewer CA and more TE and %PEN than those of HCs (CA, Cohen’s d = −0.70, P = 5.49 × 10(–8); TE, d = 0.70, P = 5.62 × 10(–8); and %PEN, d = 0.82, P = 2.85 × 10(−10)) and FRs (TE, d = 0.46, P = 3.73 × 10(–3) and %PEN, d = 0.38, P = .017). Of the 3 executive functions, CA and %PEN of FRs were intermediately impaired between patients with SCZ and HCs (CA, d = −0.41, P = .011 and %PEN, d = 0.41, P = .012). In contrast, no significant difference in TE existed between FRs and HCs (d = 0.22, P = .18). Although CA and TE were affected by the duration of illness (P < .017), %PEN was not affected by any clinical variable in patients with SCZ (P > .017). CONCLUSIONS: Executive function, particularly %PEN, could be a useful intermediate phenotype for understanding the genetic mechanisms implicated in SCZ pathophysiology. Oxford University Press 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7745249/ /pubmed/32692837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaa052 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Regular Research Articles Kataoka, Yuzuru Shimada, Takamitsu Koide, Yoko Okubo, Hiroaki Uehara, Takashi Shioiri, Toshiki Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Ohi, Kazutaka Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants |
title | Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants |
title_full | Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants |
title_fullStr | Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants |
title_short | Differences in Executive Function Among Patients With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives, and Healthy Participants |
title_sort | differences in executive function among patients with schizophrenia, their unaffected first-degree relatives, and healthy participants |
topic | Regular Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32692837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaa052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kataokayuzuru differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants AT shimadatakamitsu differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants AT koideyoko differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants AT okubohiroaki differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants AT ueharatakashi differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants AT shioiritoshiki differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants AT kawasakiyasuhiro differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants AT ohikazutaka differencesinexecutivefunctionamongpatientswithschizophreniatheirunaffectedfirstdegreerelativesandhealthyparticipants |