Cargando…
Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
BACKGROUND: Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors that mi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33334329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5 |
_version_ | 1783624587981881344 |
---|---|
author | Aziz, Aleha Saleem, Sarah Nolen, Tracy L. Pradhan, Nousheen Akber McClure, Elizabeth M. Jessani, Saleem Garces, Ana L. Hibberd, Patricia L. Moore, Janet L. Goudar, Shivaprasad S. Dhaded, Sangappa M. Esamai, Fabian Tenge, Constance Patel, Archana B. Chomba, Elwyn Mwenechanya, Musaku Bose, Carl L. Liechty, Edward A. Krebs, Nancy F. Derman, Richard J. Carlo, Waldemar A. Tshefu, Antoinette Koso-Thomas, Marion Siddiqi, Sameen Goldenberg, Robert L. |
author_facet | Aziz, Aleha Saleem, Sarah Nolen, Tracy L. Pradhan, Nousheen Akber McClure, Elizabeth M. Jessani, Saleem Garces, Ana L. Hibberd, Patricia L. Moore, Janet L. Goudar, Shivaprasad S. Dhaded, Sangappa M. Esamai, Fabian Tenge, Constance Patel, Archana B. Chomba, Elwyn Mwenechanya, Musaku Bose, Carl L. Liechty, Edward A. Krebs, Nancy F. Derman, Richard J. Carlo, Waldemar A. Tshefu, Antoinette Koso-Thomas, Marion Siddiqi, Sameen Goldenberg, Robert L. |
author_sort | Aziz, Aleha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors that might help explain these differences. METHODS: The Global Network (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) is a prospective, population-based observational study that includes all pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes in defined geographic communities in six low-middle income countries (India, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Zambia). Study staff enroll women in early pregnancy and follow-up soon after delivery and at 42 days to ascertain delivery, neonatal, and maternal outcomes. We analyzed the maternal mortality ratios (MMR), neonatal mortality rates (NMR), stillbirth rates, and potential explanatory factors from 2010 to 2018 across the GN sites. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, there were 91,076 births in Pakistan and 456,276 births in the other GN sites combined. The MMR in Pakistan was 319 per 100,000 live births compared to an average of 124 in the other sites, while the Pakistan NMR was 49.4 per 1,000 live births compared to 20.4 in the other sites. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan was 53.5 per 1000 births compared to 23.2 for the other sites. Preterm birth and low birthweight rates were also substantially higher than the other sites combined. Within weight ranges, the Pakistani site generally had significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality than the other sites combined, with differences increasing as birthweights increased. By nearly every measure, medical care for pregnant women and their newborns in the Pakistan sites was worse than at the other sites combined. CONCLUSION: The Pakistani pregnancy outcomes are much worse than those in the other GN sites. Reasons for these poorer outcomes likely include that the Pakistani sites' reproductive-aged women are largely poorly educated, undernourished, anemic, and deliver a high percentage of preterm and low-birthweight babies in settings of often inadequate maternal and newborn care. By addressing the issues highlighted in this paper there appears to be substantial room for improvements in Pakistan’s pregnancy outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7745345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77453452020-12-18 Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? Aziz, Aleha Saleem, Sarah Nolen, Tracy L. Pradhan, Nousheen Akber McClure, Elizabeth M. Jessani, Saleem Garces, Ana L. Hibberd, Patricia L. Moore, Janet L. Goudar, Shivaprasad S. Dhaded, Sangappa M. Esamai, Fabian Tenge, Constance Patel, Archana B. Chomba, Elwyn Mwenechanya, Musaku Bose, Carl L. Liechty, Edward A. Krebs, Nancy F. Derman, Richard J. Carlo, Waldemar A. Tshefu, Antoinette Koso-Thomas, Marion Siddiqi, Sameen Goldenberg, Robert L. Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors that might help explain these differences. METHODS: The Global Network (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) is a prospective, population-based observational study that includes all pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes in defined geographic communities in six low-middle income countries (India, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Zambia). Study staff enroll women in early pregnancy and follow-up soon after delivery and at 42 days to ascertain delivery, neonatal, and maternal outcomes. We analyzed the maternal mortality ratios (MMR), neonatal mortality rates (NMR), stillbirth rates, and potential explanatory factors from 2010 to 2018 across the GN sites. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, there were 91,076 births in Pakistan and 456,276 births in the other GN sites combined. The MMR in Pakistan was 319 per 100,000 live births compared to an average of 124 in the other sites, while the Pakistan NMR was 49.4 per 1,000 live births compared to 20.4 in the other sites. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan was 53.5 per 1000 births compared to 23.2 for the other sites. Preterm birth and low birthweight rates were also substantially higher than the other sites combined. Within weight ranges, the Pakistani site generally had significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality than the other sites combined, with differences increasing as birthweights increased. By nearly every measure, medical care for pregnant women and their newborns in the Pakistan sites was worse than at the other sites combined. CONCLUSION: The Pakistani pregnancy outcomes are much worse than those in the other GN sites. Reasons for these poorer outcomes likely include that the Pakistani sites' reproductive-aged women are largely poorly educated, undernourished, anemic, and deliver a high percentage of preterm and low-birthweight babies in settings of often inadequate maternal and newborn care. By addressing the issues highlighted in this paper there appears to be substantial room for improvements in Pakistan’s pregnancy outcomes. BioMed Central 2020-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7745345/ /pubmed/33334329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Aziz, Aleha Saleem, Sarah Nolen, Tracy L. Pradhan, Nousheen Akber McClure, Elizabeth M. Jessani, Saleem Garces, Ana L. Hibberd, Patricia L. Moore, Janet L. Goudar, Shivaprasad S. Dhaded, Sangappa M. Esamai, Fabian Tenge, Constance Patel, Archana B. Chomba, Elwyn Mwenechanya, Musaku Bose, Carl L. Liechty, Edward A. Krebs, Nancy F. Derman, Richard J. Carlo, Waldemar A. Tshefu, Antoinette Koso-Thomas, Marion Siddiqi, Sameen Goldenberg, Robert L. Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title | Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_full | Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_fullStr | Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_full_unstemmed | Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_short | Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_sort | why are the pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33334329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azizaleha whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT saleemsarah whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT nolentracyl whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT pradhannousheenakber whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT mcclureelizabethm whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT jessanisaleem whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT garcesanal whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT hibberdpatricial whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT moorejanetl whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT goudarshivaprasads whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT dhadedsangappam whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT esamaifabian whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT tengeconstance whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT patelarchanab whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT chombaelwyn whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT mwenechanyamusaku whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT bosecarll whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT liechtyedwarda whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT krebsnancyf whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT dermanrichardj whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT carlowaldemara whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT tshefuantoinette whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT kosothomasmarion whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT siddiqisameen whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT goldenbergrobertl whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries |