Cargando…
The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: The clinical evidence of body mass index (BMI) for survival has increased in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of BMI on the oncologic outcomes of patients with UC after surgery. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820979247 |
_version_ | 1783624633575014400 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Zhiqiang Bai, Yunjin Hu, Xu Wang, Xiaoming Han, Ping |
author_facet | Yang, Zhiqiang Bai, Yunjin Hu, Xu Wang, Xiaoming Han, Ping |
author_sort | Yang, Zhiqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The clinical evidence of body mass index (BMI) for survival has increased in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of BMI on the oncologic outcomes of patients with UC after surgery. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We collected hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) on cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the studies including upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of bladder (UCB). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies comprising over 12,200 patients were enrolled in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with normal weight, overweight was associated with better CSS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95) and RFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96). Meanwhile, we found that obese patients had worse CSS (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.03-1.26), OS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.44) and RFS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37). We observed that underweight was associated with inferior CSS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.54-2.26) in UTUC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight was a protective factor for patients with UC after surgery, while obesity and underweight predicted unfavorable survival. Individual BMI may be considered for prognostication after surgeries and patient stratification for clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7745568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77455682021-01-04 The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yang, Zhiqiang Bai, Yunjin Hu, Xu Wang, Xiaoming Han, Ping Dose Response Original Article BACKGROUND: The clinical evidence of body mass index (BMI) for survival has increased in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of BMI on the oncologic outcomes of patients with UC after surgery. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We collected hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) on cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the studies including upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of bladder (UCB). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies comprising over 12,200 patients were enrolled in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with normal weight, overweight was associated with better CSS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95) and RFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96). Meanwhile, we found that obese patients had worse CSS (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.03-1.26), OS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.44) and RFS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37). We observed that underweight was associated with inferior CSS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.54-2.26) in UTUC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight was a protective factor for patients with UC after surgery, while obesity and underweight predicted unfavorable survival. Individual BMI may be considered for prognostication after surgeries and patient stratification for clinical trials. SAGE Publications 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7745568/ /pubmed/33402880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820979247 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Zhiqiang Bai, Yunjin Hu, Xu Wang, Xiaoming Han, Ping The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of body mass index in patients with urothelial carcinoma after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820979247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangzhiqiang theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baiyunjin theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huxu theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiaoming theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanping theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangzhiqiang prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baiyunjin prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huxu prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiaoming prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanping prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |