Cargando…

The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The clinical evidence of body mass index (BMI) for survival has increased in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of BMI on the oncologic outcomes of patients with UC after surgery. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zhiqiang, Bai, Yunjin, Hu, Xu, Wang, Xiaoming, Han, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820979247
_version_ 1783624633575014400
author Yang, Zhiqiang
Bai, Yunjin
Hu, Xu
Wang, Xiaoming
Han, Ping
author_facet Yang, Zhiqiang
Bai, Yunjin
Hu, Xu
Wang, Xiaoming
Han, Ping
author_sort Yang, Zhiqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical evidence of body mass index (BMI) for survival has increased in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of BMI on the oncologic outcomes of patients with UC after surgery. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We collected hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) on cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the studies including upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of bladder (UCB). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies comprising over 12,200 patients were enrolled in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with normal weight, overweight was associated with better CSS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95) and RFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96). Meanwhile, we found that obese patients had worse CSS (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.03-1.26), OS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.44) and RFS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37). We observed that underweight was associated with inferior CSS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.54-2.26) in UTUC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight was a protective factor for patients with UC after surgery, while obesity and underweight predicted unfavorable survival. Individual BMI may be considered for prognostication after surgeries and patient stratification for clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7745568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77455682021-01-04 The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yang, Zhiqiang Bai, Yunjin Hu, Xu Wang, Xiaoming Han, Ping Dose Response Original Article BACKGROUND: The clinical evidence of body mass index (BMI) for survival has increased in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of BMI on the oncologic outcomes of patients with UC after surgery. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We collected hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) on cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the studies including upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of bladder (UCB). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies comprising over 12,200 patients were enrolled in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with normal weight, overweight was associated with better CSS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95) and RFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96). Meanwhile, we found that obese patients had worse CSS (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.03-1.26), OS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.44) and RFS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37). We observed that underweight was associated with inferior CSS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.54-2.26) in UTUC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight was a protective factor for patients with UC after surgery, while obesity and underweight predicted unfavorable survival. Individual BMI may be considered for prognostication after surgeries and patient stratification for clinical trials. SAGE Publications 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7745568/ /pubmed/33402880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820979247 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Zhiqiang
Bai, Yunjin
Hu, Xu
Wang, Xiaoming
Han, Ping
The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prognostic value of body mass index in patients with urothelial carcinoma after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820979247
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhiqiang theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baiyunjin theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huxu theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaoming theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanping theprognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangzhiqiang prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baiyunjin prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huxu prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaoming prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanping prognosticvalueofbodymassindexinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaaftersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis