Cargando…

Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements

In recent years, there has been an increase in research concerning individual differences in readers’ eye movements. However, this body of work is almost exclusively concerned with the reading of single-line texts. While spelling and reading ability have been reported to influence saccade targeting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parker, Adam J, Slattery, Timothy J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820949150
_version_ 1783624641882882048
author Parker, Adam J
Slattery, Timothy J
author_facet Parker, Adam J
Slattery, Timothy J
author_sort Parker, Adam J
collection PubMed
description In recent years, there has been an increase in research concerning individual differences in readers’ eye movements. However, this body of work is almost exclusively concerned with the reading of single-line texts. While spelling and reading ability have been reported to influence saccade targeting and fixation times during intra-line reading, where upcoming words are available for parafoveal processing, it is unclear how these variables affect fixations adjacent to return-sweeps. We, therefore, examined the influence of spelling and reading ability on return-sweep and corrective saccade parameters for 120 participants engaged in multiline text reading. Less-skilled readers and spellers tended to launch their return-sweeps closer to the end of the line, prefer a viewing location closer to the start of the next, and made more return-sweep undershoot errors. We additionally report several skill-related differences in readers’ fixation durations across multiline texts. Reading ability influenced all fixations except those resulting from return-sweep error. In contrast, spelling ability influenced only those fixations following accurate return-sweeps—where parafoveal processing was not possible prior to fixation. This stands in contrasts to an established body of work where fixation durations are related to reading but not spelling ability. These results indicate that lexical quality shapes the rate at which readers access meaning from the text by enhancing early letter encoding, and influences saccade targeting even in the absence of parafoveal target information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7745609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77456092021-01-08 Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements Parker, Adam J Slattery, Timothy J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles In recent years, there has been an increase in research concerning individual differences in readers’ eye movements. However, this body of work is almost exclusively concerned with the reading of single-line texts. While spelling and reading ability have been reported to influence saccade targeting and fixation times during intra-line reading, where upcoming words are available for parafoveal processing, it is unclear how these variables affect fixations adjacent to return-sweeps. We, therefore, examined the influence of spelling and reading ability on return-sweep and corrective saccade parameters for 120 participants engaged in multiline text reading. Less-skilled readers and spellers tended to launch their return-sweeps closer to the end of the line, prefer a viewing location closer to the start of the next, and made more return-sweep undershoot errors. We additionally report several skill-related differences in readers’ fixation durations across multiline texts. Reading ability influenced all fixations except those resulting from return-sweep error. In contrast, spelling ability influenced only those fixations following accurate return-sweeps—where parafoveal processing was not possible prior to fixation. This stands in contrasts to an established body of work where fixation durations are related to reading but not spelling ability. These results indicate that lexical quality shapes the rate at which readers access meaning from the text by enhancing early letter encoding, and influences saccade targeting even in the absence of parafoveal target information. SAGE Publications 2020-08-25 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7745609/ /pubmed/32705948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820949150 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Parker, Adam J
Slattery, Timothy J
Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements
title Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements
title_full Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements
title_fullStr Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements
title_full_unstemmed Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements
title_short Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements
title_sort spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: evidence from return-sweep eye movements
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820949150
work_keys_str_mv AT parkeradamj spellingabilityinfluencesearlyletterencodingduringreadingevidencefromreturnsweepeyemovements
AT slatterytimothyj spellingabilityinfluencesearlyletterencodingduringreadingevidencefromreturnsweepeyemovements