Cargando…

Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience

CONTEXT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the types of consultations received by an otolaryngology service at a 772-bed large metropolitan, MI-based hospital. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of the specific types of consultations received during calendar year 2016. RES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mors, Matt, Bohr, Colin, Fozo, Michael, Shermetaro, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655167
http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.11596
_version_ 1783624712361869312
author Mors, Matt
Bohr, Colin
Fozo, Michael
Shermetaro, Carl
author_facet Mors, Matt
Bohr, Colin
Fozo, Michael
Shermetaro, Carl
author_sort Mors, Matt
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the types of consultations received by an otolaryngology service at a 772-bed large metropolitan, MI-based hospital. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of the specific types of consultations received during calendar year 2016. RESULTS: A total of 518 consultations were reviewed and analyzed by the first and second authors (MM, CB). Consultations with low intervention rates included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) (32.3%), dysphonia (difficulty speaking) (16%), otalgia (earache) (20.8%), hearing loss (13.3%), rule out vocal cord dysfunction (0%), and vertigo/dizziness (0%). Epistaxis (nosebleed) was the most frequent reason for consultations, and angioedema (lip or airway swelling) was the most common airway-related consultation. Notably, emergent or urgent surgery was only performed on 4.6% of sample patients. Several common consultation reasons (e.g., longer-term hearing loss evaluation and cerumen (“earwax”) removal) could have been deferred for clinic-based evaluation where audiograms and microscopes are more readily available. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest areas for continuing education for primary care provider and resident education to place more appropriate hospital consultations. Annual resident lectures to prepare junior residents for the most common call scenarios (i.e., control epistaxis and incision and drainage of peritonsillar abscesses) could be helpful in this area. In addition, didactic lectures for primary care physicians on how to evaluate patients with dysphagia may be of value as this was a common consult for otolaryngologist referrals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7746046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77460462021-03-01 Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience Mors, Matt Bohr, Colin Fozo, Michael Shermetaro, Carl Spartan Med Res J Original Contribution CONTEXT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the types of consultations received by an otolaryngology service at a 772-bed large metropolitan, MI-based hospital. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of the specific types of consultations received during calendar year 2016. RESULTS: A total of 518 consultations were reviewed and analyzed by the first and second authors (MM, CB). Consultations with low intervention rates included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) (32.3%), dysphonia (difficulty speaking) (16%), otalgia (earache) (20.8%), hearing loss (13.3%), rule out vocal cord dysfunction (0%), and vertigo/dizziness (0%). Epistaxis (nosebleed) was the most frequent reason for consultations, and angioedema (lip or airway swelling) was the most common airway-related consultation. Notably, emergent or urgent surgery was only performed on 4.6% of sample patients. Several common consultation reasons (e.g., longer-term hearing loss evaluation and cerumen (“earwax”) removal) could have been deferred for clinic-based evaluation where audiograms and microscopes are more readily available. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest areas for continuing education for primary care provider and resident education to place more appropriate hospital consultations. Annual resident lectures to prepare junior residents for the most common call scenarios (i.e., control epistaxis and incision and drainage of peritonsillar abscesses) could be helpful in this area. In addition, didactic lectures for primary care physicians on how to evaluate patients with dysphagia may be of value as this was a common consult for otolaryngologist referrals. MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7746046/ /pubmed/33655167 http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.11596 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Mors, Matt
Bohr, Colin
Fozo, Michael
Shermetaro, Carl
Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience
title Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience
title_full Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience
title_fullStr Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience
title_full_unstemmed Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience
title_short Consultation Intervention Rates for the Otolaryngology Service: A Large Metropolitan Hospital Experience
title_sort consultation intervention rates for the otolaryngology service: a large metropolitan hospital experience
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655167
http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.11596
work_keys_str_mv AT morsmatt consultationinterventionratesfortheotolaryngologyservicealargemetropolitanhospitalexperience
AT bohrcolin consultationinterventionratesfortheotolaryngologyservicealargemetropolitanhospitalexperience
AT fozomichael consultationinterventionratesfortheotolaryngologyservicealargemetropolitanhospitalexperience
AT shermetarocarl consultationinterventionratesfortheotolaryngologyservicealargemetropolitanhospitalexperience