Cargando…

Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project

CONTEXT: In 2016, the McLaren Oakland Department of Emergency Medicine developed and implemented a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (CP-ADP) to identify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain who were at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and appropria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Troiano, Isaac, Mitchell, Mary, Schury, Mark, Butki, Nikolai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655172
http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.11727
_version_ 1783624717852213248
author Troiano, Isaac
Mitchell, Mary
Schury, Mark
Butki, Nikolai
author_facet Troiano, Isaac
Mitchell, Mary
Schury, Mark
Butki, Nikolai
author_sort Troiano, Isaac
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: In 2016, the McLaren Oakland Department of Emergency Medicine developed and implemented a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (CP-ADP) to identify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain who were at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and appropriate for outpatient follow-up. The evaluation of the QI/PS project demonstrated that only 47% of the patients discharged from the ED under the CP-ADP received outpatient follow-up. In response, a second round of the PDSA cycle modified the CP-ADP to add a multidisciplinary provider driven follow-up. METHODS: After ED discharge, patients in the CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up were contacted by a primary care physician to schedule a follow-up appointment. The premise was that this provider driven follow-up would alleviate navigation of the health care system as a barrier to follow-up. RESULTS: The evaluation of the modified CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up demonstrated that 9 of the 30 patients discharged from the ED were able to be contacted. 21 of the patients were unable to be reached by the phone number they provided. Only 3 patients discharged with provider driven follow-up showed up to follow up appointments. CONCLUSIONS: There were some internal process failures identified that contributed to the low numbers of patients that were successfully contacted. External factors such as patient access to phones and means of communication were also discussed as factors that were originally not considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7746070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77460702021-03-01 Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project Troiano, Isaac Mitchell, Mary Schury, Mark Butki, Nikolai Spartan Med Res J Original Contribution CONTEXT: In 2016, the McLaren Oakland Department of Emergency Medicine developed and implemented a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (CP-ADP) to identify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain who were at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and appropriate for outpatient follow-up. The evaluation of the QI/PS project demonstrated that only 47% of the patients discharged from the ED under the CP-ADP received outpatient follow-up. In response, a second round of the PDSA cycle modified the CP-ADP to add a multidisciplinary provider driven follow-up. METHODS: After ED discharge, patients in the CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up were contacted by a primary care physician to schedule a follow-up appointment. The premise was that this provider driven follow-up would alleviate navigation of the health care system as a barrier to follow-up. RESULTS: The evaluation of the modified CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up demonstrated that 9 of the 30 patients discharged from the ED were able to be contacted. 21 of the patients were unable to be reached by the phone number they provided. Only 3 patients discharged with provider driven follow-up showed up to follow up appointments. CONCLUSIONS: There were some internal process failures identified that contributed to the low numbers of patients that were successfully contacted. External factors such as patient access to phones and means of communication were also discussed as factors that were originally not considered. MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7746070/ /pubmed/33655172 http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.11727 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Troiano, Isaac
Mitchell, Mary
Schury, Mark
Butki, Nikolai
Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project
title Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project
title_full Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project
title_fullStr Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project
title_full_unstemmed Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project
title_short Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project
title_sort provider driven follow-up in a chest pain accelerated diagnostic protocol: round two of the pdsa cycle in a multidisciplinary quality improvement patient safety project
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655172
http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.11727
work_keys_str_mv AT troianoisaac providerdrivenfollowupinachestpainaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolroundtwoofthepdsacycleinamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementpatientsafetyproject
AT mitchellmary providerdrivenfollowupinachestpainaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolroundtwoofthepdsacycleinamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementpatientsafetyproject
AT schurymark providerdrivenfollowupinachestpainaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolroundtwoofthepdsacycleinamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementpatientsafetyproject
AT butkinikolai providerdrivenfollowupinachestpainaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolroundtwoofthepdsacycleinamultidisciplinaryqualityimprovementpatientsafetyproject